Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-24-2009, 09:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
 
Bill O'Rights's Avatar
 
Location: In the dust of the archives
My Horrible SUV

So, I'm standing on the front porch last night, having a smoke, when I noticed that my wife's mini-van is quite a bit larger than my SUV. I drive a Ford Explorer, while she drives a Chrysler Town & Country. Now, I know that it's fun to deride SUVs, and their drivers, but what about mini-vans? I often hear (read) people complaining that they can't see past an SUV. But, her van is longer, wider, and noticibly taller than my Explorer. Your vision would obviously be more obstructed by her van than my SUV. As for gas guzzling...my Explorer has a 4.0 engine, while her van has a 3.8. Not a whole lot of difference there. So, fuel economy isn't that much of an issue. Why is it then, that my SUV is so much more socially unacceptable than my wife's mini-van? Just putting my evening ponderings out there to the masses.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony

"Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus

It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt.
Bill O'Rights is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Probably the utility vs image factor. It is generally assumed minivans are undesirable vehicles due to their 'stigma'. Therefore if you drive one, it's because you have to for the utility, not because you want to.


This is not the case with SUVs, there is a status attached to them that is actually positive in value, so people drive them just because they like them etc. It isn't that they don't have utility, that just doesn't seem to be the primary reason for owning one. There is also very little in the way of utility that another vehicle cannot accomplish at least as well, if not better. Vans for indoor capacity, trucks for towing, although and SUV kinda falls in the middle ground. So, I guess, as long as your SUV has a hitch on it, don't worry about it.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Yeah, the status symbol SUVs have become is a big part of it.

But I do tend to question drivers I see puttering around in SUVs and minivans alike if they are the only passenger and cargo in the entire vehicle.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:49 AM   #4 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Compare the worst SUV to the worst van and you'll get your answer. The Dodge Durango gets 12 mpg combined. The worst minivan (possibly your Town and Country) is probably going to be in the 20 mpg range.

You two don't get the same gas mileage. The T&C probably gets about 16/23 (depending on the year) and you probably get about 12/19.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Bill, how many children do you and your wife have? How many DINK's do you see driving around in minivans? Very few, but it is "acceptable" for a childless couple to have an SUV. The minivans has an image of mommywagon. As far as handling, vans can sometimes do better than SUV's because they have a more roadworthy (less compliant) suspension and their center of gravity tends to ride lower. For the same fuel economy as your explorer, you wife can haul more people and more gear. It's towing capacity is not going to be too far behind, either. Personally, when I have kids, my wife and I will probably have a minivan, possibly a Honda Pilot SUV if they can make a comfortable seat more like the Acura MDX.

Now let's talk about the social acceptability of that cigarette, hmm?
new man is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:19 AM   #6 (permalink)
part of the problem
 
squeeeb's Avatar
 
Location: hic et ubique
Quote:
Originally Posted by new man View Post
How many DINK's do you see driving around in minivans? :
whoa buddy. why are you slamming on the vietnamese?
__________________
onward to mayhem!
squeeeb is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:34 AM   #7 (permalink)
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
When was the last "badass in a minivan" commercial on TV, anyway?
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."
Plan9 is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:38 AM   #8 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
There's one going now.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:38 AM   #9 (permalink)
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Oh, come on. SUVs are just glorified minivans.... Who are we kidding?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:38 AM   #10 (permalink)
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
 
Bill O'Rights's Avatar
 
Location: In the dust of the archives
Quote:
Originally Posted by new man View Post
Bill, how many children do you and your wife have?
I have a 21 year old, not living at home. We have a 6 year old, and we are raising our 2-year-old grand daughter.
So...2 really.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Yeah, the status symbol SUVs have become is a big part of it.
I can possibly see that, if it were…say…an Escalade. It’s a 94 Ford Explorer. I don’t really see a status thing going on there. My SUV has an emphasis on the word “utility”. I lay the back seats down, and I can haul anything that I used to haul in my truck. It keeps me from having to rent the truck at Home Depot. Put the seats back up, and there is room for the 2 kids in the back seat. It has plenty of ground clearance, so I take it “off road” when we go camping or fishing. In short..I actually use the thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
But I do tend to question drivers I see puttering around in SUVs and minivans alike if they are the only passenger and cargo in the entire vehicle.
Mmmm…yeeaah…I can see that. But, bear in mind, it is my primary vehicle. I will not always be toting spouse, kids and their assorted gear. Sometimes I just need it to transport my lone ass somewhere.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hektore View Post
It is generally assumed minivans are undesirable vehicles due to their 'stigma'.
Perhaps it is my age, but I see no “stigma” in the mini-van. When we go somewhere as a family, we will typically take the T&C. It is newer, it is shinier and, quite frankly, has much more room in it. I am not the least bit embarrassed to be seen driving it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
You two don't get the same gas mileage.
Actually, truth be told, we get very similar gas mileage. Barring certain variables, such as use of the four wheel drive, the Explorer is only 2 MPG behind the T&C. Not enough that I care.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony

"Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus

It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt.
Bill O'Rights is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:45 AM   #11 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Just a hunch: check the air filter on the Chrysler.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:47 AM   #12 (permalink)
zomgomgomgomgomgomg
 
telekinetic's Avatar
 
Location: Fauxenix, Azerona
SUVs are generally derided in a way minivans are not, because they have offroading functionality that the typical urban user will never need or use, and often pay a hefty fuel penalty to do so.
__________________
twisted no more
telekinetic is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 11:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
 
Bill O'Rights's Avatar
 
Location: In the dust of the archives
Will, I guaratee you that there is nothing wrong with the air filter. I am very anal when it comes to vehicle upkeep. Unlike my wife, who tends to just gas-n-go. Fact is, the Explorer is beefier and therefore heavier, but the T&C is larger. The T&C does have a smaller engine, but not by much. If I were to "blame" my 2 MPG difference on anything, it would be the fact that 1st generation Ford Explorers have all the aerodynamics of your average shoebox.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony

"Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus

It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt.

Last edited by Bill O'Rights; 06-24-2009 at 12:12 PM..
Bill O'Rights is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:03 PM   #14 (permalink)
More Than You Expect
 
Manic_Skafe's Avatar
 
Location: Queens
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistedmosaic View Post
SUVs are generally derided in a way minivans are not, because they have offroading functionality that the typical urban user will never need or use, and often pay a hefty fuel penalty to do so.
Ditto. Those adverts of the American Man in full control of his destiny conquering nature in a highly impractical vehicle are just plain insulting. Nothing brings the stupidity full circle like seeing one of these parked several feet from the curb because the driver was too worried about scraping their rims on the curb.

But that obviously isn't you BoR.

Quote:
Originally Posted by squeeeb View Post
whoa buddy. why are you slamming on the vietnamese?
Unless you're kidding, DINK = Dual Income No Kids.
__________________
"Porn is a zoo of exotic animals that becomes boring upon ownership." -Nersesian
Manic_Skafe is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:06 PM   #15 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Fair enough. Is there a bunch of stuff in the van?

Anyway, the point is that some SUVs are absolutely horrendous when it comes to efficiency. There's no excuse for 10-12 mpg anymore, even if you're building a vehicle to haul. It's those SUV's that give most SUVs a bad name.

On the flip side the Ford Escape Hybrid was a pioneer in hybrid technology in SUVs.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:22 PM   #16 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
There's no excuse for 10-12 mpg anymore, even if you're building a vehicle to haul.
This is just flat out untrue, work trucks when loaded get less than that, when they're hauling (and work trucks almost always are) it doesn't matter how new or efficient it is, they don't make a truck that does better.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:23 PM   #17 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Fotzlid's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Boston area
edit: already noted by someone else
Fotzlid is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:27 PM   #18 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hektore View Post
This is just flat out untrue, work trucks when loaded get less than that, when they're hauling (and work trucks almost always are) it doesn't matter how new or efficient it is, they don't make a truck that does better.
When loaded, sure, but not when they're carting around some groceries. The H2 gets something like 10 mpg average without towing or hauling anything but a driver. The Dodge Durango gets 8 mpg not hauling anything but it's own weight around town.
Willravel is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
comfortably numb...
 
uncle phil's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: upstate
i've got a 2002 toyota 4-runner (read SUV) that gets 19 mpg around the circuit and 23 mpg on the open road (read loaded with florida stuff...)
__________________
"We were wrong, terribly wrong. (We) should not have tried to fight a guerrilla war with conventional military tactics against a foe willing to absorb enormous casualties...in a country lacking the fundamental political stability necessary to conduct effective military and pacification operations. It could not be done and it was not done."
- Robert S. McNamara
-----------------------------------------
"We will take our napalm and flame throwers out of the land that scarcely knows the use of matches...
We will leave you your small joys and smaller troubles."
- Eugene McCarthy in "Vietnam Message"
-----------------------------------------
never wrestle with a pig.
you both get dirty;
the pig likes it.
uncle phil is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:39 PM   #20 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
I can't find it but there was some report on SUV vs. Minivan years ago that stated the difference was the kind of person that chose it. Something about SUV driver wanting to control and command, where the minivan driver wanted to be part of the community.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:43 PM   #21 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
When loaded, sure, but not when they're carting around some groceries. The H2 gets something like 10 mpg average without towing or hauling anything but a driver. The Dodge Durango gets 8 mpg not hauling anything but it's own weight around town.
My apologies I didn't realize you meant that in terms of using a vehicle build for towing as a daily driver. That's a whole level of lunacy that only sort of makes MPG relevant.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:44 PM   #22 (permalink)
lightform
 
lostgirl's Avatar
 
Location: Edge of the deep green sea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hektore View Post
Probably the utility vs image factor. It is generally assumed minivans are undesirable vehicles due to their 'stigma'. Therefore if you drive one, it's because you have to for the utility, not because you want to.


This is not the case with SUVs, there is a status attached to them that is actually positive in value, so people drive them just because they like them etc. It isn't that they don't have utility, that just doesn't seem to be the primary reason for owning one. There is also very little in the way of utility that another vehicle cannot accomplish at least as well, if not better. Vans for indoor capacity, trucks for towing, although and SUV kinda falls in the middle ground. So, I guess, as long as your SUV has a hitch on it, don't worry about it.
Bingo!

I still don't like a lot of minivan drivers either. I get cut off by just as many of them as I do SUVs.
__________________
We're about to go through the crucible, but we'll come out the other side.
We always arise from our own ashes. Everything returns later in its changed form. - Children of Dune
lostgirl is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:44 PM   #23 (permalink)
part of the problem
 
squeeeb's Avatar
 
Location: hic et ubique
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic_Skafe View Post
..........

Unless you're kidding, DINK = Dual Income No Kids.
yeah, i know. i was just trying to be offended by something that was not meant to be taken offensively.
__________________
onward to mayhem!
squeeeb is offline  
Old 06-24-2009, 07:32 PM   #24 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
Oh, come on. SUVs are just glorified minivans.... Who are we kidding?
I think some of the newer "crossovers" could be minivans. The only difference is they don't have the sliding doors. And the people that buy them don't want to be mistaken for a soccer mom, (even if they are one.) so they will never have sliding doors.
Bill, even though your Explorer may be moderate, SUVs will forever be identified with the likes of Escalators, Hummers, Ford Excesspeditions, Lincoln Extravagators, and Chevy UberUrbans. Until you downsize to something like a Subaru Forester. Which is really just a small car with a little extra clearance. Like my 1981 AMC Eagle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hektore View Post
Probably the utility vs image factor. It is generally assumed minivans are undesirable vehicles due to their 'stigma'. Therefore if you drive one, it's because you have to for the utility, not because you want to.Yeah, Yeah, people extol "family values" but don't want to be seen in a minivan.
This is not the case with SUVs, there is a status attached to them that is actually positive in value,That really depends on who you ask. Just ask any greenie what they think of an Escalade. so people drive them just because they like them etc. It isn't that they don't have utility, that just doesn't seem to be the primary reason for owning one.I think a lot guys buy SUVs (and trucks in general) because the like the hard-working, hard-playing, longer, harder dick image. Not that there is anything wrong with any of those things. There is also very little in the way of utility that another vehicle cannot accomplish at least as well, if not better. True. My Dad, who's a farmer, owns a hardware store, and has an active disdain for status, drives a 2001 Chrysler Town & Country (all wheel drive, which they no longer make) as his vehicle of choice. He got it as a hand me down from Mom, but says he loves it. His old Jeep pickup just gets used for the really dirty stuff, anymore.Vans for indoor capacity, trucks for towing, although and SUV kinda falls in the middle ground. So, I guess, as long as your SUV has a hitch on it, don't worry about it.
Lindy
Lindy is offline  
Old 06-26-2009, 08:24 AM   #25 (permalink)
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
My car gets 10 mpg, so there.

Also, I think it really ties into status vs. need.

If I had a dime for everyone in an H2 who never has anything in the back seats or the trunk, and who never even has enough to occupy the HOV lane, I'd be rich. The moment I see an SUV with all of the seats filled, that'll be the day. I really don't have an issue with SUVs personally, but I can see how it bugs some people.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
Jinn is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 12:14 PM   #26 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Leto's Avatar
 
Location: The Danforth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel View Post
There's one going now.

A-Team van right? the first one...
__________________
You said you didn't give a fuck about hockey
And I never saw someone say that before
You held my hand and we walked home the long way
You were loosening my grip on Bobby Orr


http://dune.wikia.com/wiki/Leto_Atreides_I
Leto is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 12:36 PM   #27 (permalink)
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Yeah, the first one is the A-Team van, a 1983 GMC van with the v8 and a few modifications. I love it when a van comes together.
Willravel is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 07:46 PM   #28 (permalink)
Poo-tee-weet?
 
JStrider's Avatar
 
Location: The Woodlands, TX
I liked my explorer a lot more then the minivan I'm driving now... I actually used it for the offroad capabilities pretty regularly, camping, and adventuring... I miss the hell outta that car...
__________________
-=JStrider=-

~Clatto Verata Nicto
JStrider is offline  
Old 07-14-2009, 07:58 PM   #29 (permalink)
Yarp.
 
Dammitall's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crompsin View Post
When was the last "badass in a minivan" commercial on TV, anyway?
I prefer this one myself. You really can't go wrong with Heart.

__________________
If one million people replaced a two mile car trip once a week with a bike ride, carbon dioxide emissions would be reduced by 50,000 tons per year. If one out of ten car commuters switched to a bike, carbon dioxide emissions would be reduced by 25.4 million tons per year. [2milechallenge.com]

Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
it's better if you can ride without having to wonder if the guy in the car behind you is a sociopath, i find.
Dammitall is offline  
 

Tags
horrible, suv

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360