Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2005, 11:42 AM   #1 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
SP2 is coming, whether you want it or not

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../sp2aumng.mspx

Quote:
UPDATE: Time is running out! Please note that the mechanism to temporarily disable delivery of Windows XP SP2 is only available for a period of 240 days (8 months) from August 16, 2004. At the end of this period (after April 12, 2005), Windows XP SP2 will be delivered to all Windows XP and Windows XP Service Pack 1 systems.
I'm not sure how this is going to work, but apparently MS is going to shove SP2 down our throats next Tuesday. I have a laptop with SP2 that has no problems, and also a desktop with SP1. I have no plans right now to upgrade the desktop. I don't know about you, but I'd rather not have decisions like that made for me.
Slavakion is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 11:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
All hail the Mountain King
 
the_marq's Avatar
 
Location: Black Mesa
I wonder how this will impact me as I still have not even installed SP1 on any of my XP machines.
__________________
The Truth:

Johnny Cash could have kicked Bruce Lee's ass if he wanted to.

#3 in a series
the_marq is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 11:49 AM   #3 (permalink)
AHH! Custom Title!!
 
liquidlight's Avatar
 
Location: The twisted warpings of my brain.
Considering the amount of traffic my router blocks EVERY DAY by machines infested with viruses because they're missing security patches I could see this as having some very positive effects, though I agree with wondering how they're going to implement it, as for having the decision made for you, you gave that right away when you agreed to the EULA. I'm pretty sure that there is a clause that reserves the software as the IP of Microsoft and they reserve the right to make "necessary" changes as they see fit.

Also, if you're using an AMD processor you'd much rather be on SP2 anyway, much better support for the chips I just disable the Security Center features and go about my merry way.
__________________
Halfway to hell and picking up speed.
liquidlight is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 12:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_marq
I wonder how this will impact me as I still have not even installed SP1 on any of my XP machines.
That's odd. I don't think I've heard of any misadventures with SP1, and it (supposedly) makes your PC more stable/fast/OMG etc.

Maybe I can just tell my firewall to block microsoft....
Slavakion is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 01:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
Free Mars!
 
feelgood's Avatar
 
Location: I dunno, there's white people around me saying "eh" all the time
What's the big deal against SP2? I'm using it and I haven't gotten much problems at all. Anybody care to list their grudge against M$soft?
__________________
Looking out the window, that's an act of war. Staring at my shoes, that's an act of war. Committing an act of war? Oh you better believe that's an act of war
feelgood is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 01:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
AHH! Custom Title!!
 
liquidlight's Avatar
 
Location: The twisted warpings of my brain.
Update: They're not removing your choice, having reread the tech article this delay mechanism only applies to corporate entities running WinXP that have the AutoUpdate feature enabled This system overrode the AutoUpdate so that SP2 wouldn't be applied automatically with other critical updates. Now that it's been 8 months MS is disabling the capability for the override and anybody using the AutoUpdate feature will now receive SP2 unless it's bene previously installed by the admin/management tools (which is what should have been done in the interim). They're still evil, but MS doesn't like getting sued apparently!
__________________
Halfway to hell and picking up speed.
liquidlight is offline  
Old 04-07-2005, 01:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
Professional Loafer
 
bendsley's Avatar
 
Location: texas
Corporate networks that have some sort of push mechanism installed to push out updates will not be affected by this. Of course, this is being controlled via group policies and not WindowsUpdate on the clients themselves.

The site listed below will explain more than I care to write in here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../sp2aumng.mspx
__________________
"You hear the one about the fella who died, went to the pearly gates? St. Peter let him in. Sees a guy in a suit making a closing argument. Says, "Who's that?" St. Peter says, "Oh, that's God. Thinks he's Denny Crane."
bendsley is offline  
Old 04-08-2005, 02:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Upright
 
This just further enforces the fact that when you buy (lease) Microsoft you do not own anything. How can anyone accept this behavior when it is a known fact that SP2 breaks software and machines? I understand that well written programs shouldn't break, but how can microsoft really think that this is acceptable? Installing SP2 should still be an option.
jamesconrad is offline  
Old 04-08-2005, 06:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
Mjollnir Incarnate
 
Location: Lost in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesconrad
This just further enforces the fact that when you buy (lease) Microsoft you do not own anything. How can anyone accept this behavior when it is a known fact that SP2 breaks software and machines? I understand that well written programs shouldn't break, but how can microsoft really think that this is acceptable? Installing SP2 should still be an option.
Most software has patches for SP2 by now. I'd rather not take the chance of breaking anything by adding SP2 to my desktop.
Slavakion is offline  
Old 04-09-2005, 12:12 AM   #10 (permalink)
Go Cardinals
 
soccerchamp76's Avatar
 
Location: St. Louis/Cincinnati
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesconrad
This just further enforces the fact that when you buy (lease) Microsoft you do not own anything. How can anyone accept this behavior when it is a known fact that SP2 breaks software and machines? I understand that well written programs shouldn't break, but how can microsoft really think that this is acceptable? Installing SP2 should still be an option.

Because most people are retarded and do not install the updates automatically and therefore become carriers of viruses and pass them along to millions of others.
__________________
Brian Griffin: Ah, if my memory serves me, this is the physics department.
Chris Griffin: That would explain all the gravity.
soccerchamp76 is offline  
Old 04-09-2005, 12:59 AM   #11 (permalink)
Psycho
 
superiorrain's Avatar
 
Location: London
I installed it but in knocked out my CD burner and try as i do, i can get the thing to work, something about the kernal drive not recognising it. So at the moment at least i live my life without a burner but safe in the knowledge that SP2 is installed.

If anyone has any ideas about getting the burner installed again, let me know. Currently it won't even let me install from the CD-ROM. Strange goings on.
__________________
"The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible." - Arthur C. Clarke
superiorrain is offline  
Old 04-09-2005, 01:44 AM   #12 (permalink)
Psycho
 
SVT01Cobra's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere, Missouri
They're not "shoving it down our throats". They're putting a patch in with fixes for crucial problems, and security updates in their software that NEED to be put in.

Would you prefer them not fixing any problems at all, and seeing how long their software lasts before it's completly fucked by people finding holes in their system?


A good analogy, would be like most online games. If there's a problem, they're going to patch it, and you're not given a choice whether or not you want to download it, because there can be serious problems caused in the game if left unchecked.


I don't see a problem with it at all.
SVT01Cobra is offline  
Old 04-09-2005, 02:12 AM   #13 (permalink)
Insane
 
Tandem's Avatar
 
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Speaking for myself, I've never had a problem with either SP1 or SP2.
Regardless of what we 'grains of sand' think about weather or not anything is being forced down out throats - chew on a peice of rubber for a moment.

I'm sure that Henry Ford didn't cop such ignorant crap from the public after he produced his second, thrid or fouth car for the masses. Unless you are willing to sit down and write your own OS kernel - and make it available to the masses to criticise; then accept that the reality that life is not as perfect as you see it through your rose coloured glasses.

All OS's are extremely complex jigsaw puzzles, to expect a release without bugs/problems is to continue to wear those rose coloured glasses. If Microsoft did not provide and enforce the SP regime that they do, then they would be commercially irrisponsible and be liable for massive losses, should they occurr.

You have a choice to install SP1 / SP2. Like you have the choice to service your car, or change the bald tyres on your bike. If in the end it's forced upon you, then swallow the pill and keep walking.

That's my two cents.
Tandem is offline  
Old 04-09-2005, 10:27 AM   #14 (permalink)
Go Cardinals
 
soccerchamp76's Avatar
 
Location: St. Louis/Cincinnati
I could consider myself lucky, but I too, have not had any problems with either SP1 or SP2. It works best installed on a fresh system, however.
__________________
Brian Griffin: Ah, if my memory serves me, this is the physics department.
Chris Griffin: That would explain all the gravity.
soccerchamp76 is offline  
Old 04-17-2005, 11:38 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junkie
 
zero2's Avatar
 
If you goto start-->run-->services.msc, then stop & disable Automatic Updates, it will probably keep sp2 off your system too.
zero2 is offline  
 

Tags
coming, sp2

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:35 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360