Nvidia's New Driver
here you go---> http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_2k_52.16
|
anyone have any feedback on these drivers?
ie. preformance or stability...? im scared to upgrade, everything 'seems' to be working ok. |
and what are the compatible hardware?
everything? |
Quote:
|
It can't do anything worse then the last version 45.23 did to my system (Windows took 10 mins to start and would just crash and restart continuously). However, that was the first time I ever had problems with Nvidia drivers.
|
grumpy=lab rat.
I have GeForce4 MX440 in an Athlon 1900XP system running Windows XP Home Edition. Downloaded and installed the new driver. Looks and works OK so far. No bad news = good news? |
A friend of mine downloaded and installed it on his GeForce4 440 Go 64MB and reported a loss of about 300 points on 3DMark2001SE.
I haven't tried it yet on my GF4 Ti4600 -- no time to do so, but I'll probably end up doing it just to see what happens. |
Set a restore point or go to device manager and roll back the driver. It's not going to explode, play around with it.
|
These are designed with the FX cards in mind aren't they? I guess I'll find out in a minute anyway :)
|
gain of about 100 points average on 3dmark2k3 from the 52.14's
amdxp barton 1.83@2.23 gainward gf4 ti4600 (NO oc) |
drivers are never DESIGNED for all cards, so I would say give them a try and if u dont like em revert. About the 300 loss, perhaps Nvidia is actually doing something about there "optimizations" aka image quality cut on 3dmark2001/3.
|
Quote:
|
New nVidia Drivers
With the new drivers came the Media Center which attached itself to my startup menu. Do I need this Media Center running in order for the new drivers to work properly? Just wondering. Thanks
|
Quote:
Anyone install them on a FX card yet? I'd like to know before I do. I had a GF4Ti4200 128mb and moved up to a FX5600 256mb. I didn't see a real improvement in Q3 timedemos. |
Quote:
I still haven't upgraded, way too lazy to reboot my computer, but I'll get around to it eventually. |
Quote:
|
About the same performance for me. Using a TI4400 128MB. Maybe a bit cleaner gfx.
|
Quote:
|
Yea, from what I heard the latest drivers are mainly just DX9 improvements, as NVidia is about done coding driver improvements for DX8.
That would explain the Halo FPS jump. |
I got a lot of flashy textures while playing desert combat, so i rolled back. FX5600 256mb is what i have, but the new ones do run halo/hl2 a lot better. Only got a 9fps jump, but some of the textures look a little better.
yellowgowild: 5900s arent all that uncommon.... |
Quote:
|
Just upgraded myself. After a brief problem with nView not working at all (crashing on attempts to change settings), I uninstalled fully before reinstalling and seems to be working fine... (ti4200)
|
The new drivers trashed my textures in some games (Desert Combat) so I guess I have to roll back. Certain textures just vanish in game and you can see the wire frame. It's like the old "wall hack" drivers that ASUS had a while back :)
Is there a correct way to roll back to a previous version and which version do you recomend? |
Quote:
|
i'm pretty sure i haven't put directX 9 on my comp yet. should i not even bother with the new Nvidia drivers?
|
Yes, do put on DX9. Most games and utilizing it now. Just don't use the newest nvidia drivers with it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I must find the release notes... Edit: DX9 was inplemented in the previous version. Only a few enancements in this version. |
Quote:
-Lasereth |
Just today I installed the new drivers and lost about 120 3dMark2001. :( Now I gotta roll back. Oh yeah, this was on an old 64MB MX440SE
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project