Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Sexuality (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sexuality/)
-   -   What ever happened to courting? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sexuality/92556-what-ever-happened-courting.html)

Mantus 07-27-2005 06:30 AM

What ever happened to courting?
 
Is it possible to win a girl that rejects you at first?

There is a real defeatist attitude among men these days. She said "no", so I give up. Worse still, if they do decide to continue pursuing the girl they end up doing it in a kind of tame - give her space - just be friends - sort of way.

Yet almost every romantic story you read or see on TV features the guy actually winning over the girl, despite earlier rejections.

Is this a case of fantasy vs. reality or have modern men become wimps with soft egos?

I have to admit that I am afraid of having my ego bruised. I only go for women who are responcive from the start and rarelly if ever both with one's who give me the cold shoulder right away. With the acception of my first girlfriend, who way my biggest enemy before we started dating. Ofcourse I was differnt back then. I feel that this culture of ours changed me for the worse somehow.

Jinn 07-27-2005 06:37 AM

A lot of it has to do with the harsh punishments for "sexual harassment" that there are nowadays. While there are a few well-intentioned men out there trying to pursue their love, there are just as many creeps who would use that protection to harass women. If you chase a girl after she says NO, you've now jumped into the realm of sexual harassment. Part is legislation, part is ego.

Glory's Sun 07-27-2005 06:41 AM

I just want to point out that men have <i>always</i> had soft or delicate egos. It's not just the "modern" man. Some men are better at hiding their bruises than others.

Leto 07-27-2005 06:44 AM

What? You mean "ASL?" isn't enough courtship?

genuinegirly 07-27-2005 06:47 AM

I don't know that sexual harassment has much to do with it. My real question is: Was the age-old ideal of courting a reality? Or was it just a fantasy laid out by women who longed for a man (or men) to chase after her? I have made some love interests insane by requesting a "courting" mentality: was this ever something that men would try? I'd love to know if this truly is a lost art.

Glory's Sun 07-27-2005 06:59 AM

I don't think "courting" is dead. I think it just advances more rapidly now. In the old days (yes I use that term lightly) it was a drawn out process almost like a job interview. In todays society, people move and respond at a much faster pace and don't have time for all the "application" types of rituals.

denim 07-27-2005 07:24 AM

"Sexual harassment" has to do with specific situations, like at work. You might be thinking of "stalking". Believe it or not, it's possible to keep after a woman after she turns you down w/o having to worry about either of these. It's a matter of persistance and technique.

For instance, Once Upon a Time, there was this coed I was going to school with. Bright, pretty, bright. Did I say she was bright? Well, she was. Anyway, she was the kind with a cloud of guys around her. I was more persistant than any of them, and had classes with her at times. We'd sit together. I'd call her on the phone. After around 15 months of this, I'd convinced her I was interested for real, that I was a real person, and she wanted to continue.

Harassment? Nope. Sometimes, a person just takes a while to warm to you, or vis versa.

Charlatan 07-27-2005 07:32 AM

Well after Froggy went a courtin' it all just went down hill from there...

Turbotom 07-27-2005 07:48 AM

I said "no" to a girl once...She became a close friend and she won me over!
You might consider sticking around, supporting someone, and loving someone "courting;" it's just different now.

StanT 07-27-2005 07:59 AM

My wife turned me down a couple of times over an 8 year span before we finally stared dating. No persistance involved, we went our separate ways, ran into each other again, and apparently I was more interesting the third time around.

I take no, as no. I'm really not interested in games, courtship or otherwise.

Turbotom 07-27-2005 10:45 AM

It's not always games. It's usually uncertainty. Sometimes it's as simple as one person is just too busy to notice, have time to care, or worried about other things.
A relationship should be built on friendship.

Jinn 07-27-2005 11:03 AM

edit: double post..

Jinn 07-27-2005 11:15 AM

Quote:

"Sexual harassment" has to do with specific situations, like at work. You might be thinking of "stalking". Believe it or not, it's possible to keep after a woman after she turns you down w/o having to worry about either of these. It's a matter of persistance and technique.

For instance, Once Upon a Time, there was this coed I was going to school with. Bright, pretty, bright. Did I say she was bright? Well, she was. Anyway, she was the kind with a cloud of guys around her. I was more persistant than any of them, and had classes with her at times. We'd sit together. I'd call her on the phone. After around 15 months of this, I'd convinced her I was interested for real, that I was a real person, and she wanted to continue.

Harassment? Nope. Sometimes, a person just takes a while to warm to you, or vis versa.
Harassment? Yep. Did she press charges? Nope. That's the difference -- if she really wants to, she can sue you for it.

Quote:

Any unwanted attention of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment can include (but is not limited to) physical abuse such as unwanted touching, pinching or cornering; verbal abuse such as suggestive or sexist remarks, propositions or lewd comments; demands for sexual favours; and sexual assault. Although offenders often try to excuse their behaviour as "joking" or "flirting", the harassment is no less real to the victim.
After she's said "no", further advances are now "unwanted" under the legal letter of the law. If a girl says "no", I'm not going to waste my time pursuing it.. ESPECIALLY if I can get in legal trouble for doing so.


"Behaviors such as sexual joking and commentary, touching, or requests for dates.."

Sexual Harassment.

"a man putting his arm on a woman or patting her on the shoulder"

Sexual Harassment.

If your advances are refused at any point, you are not making "unwanted advances" and there are "unheeded declines." In doing so, you've created the "hostile environment" specified in the act, and are guilty of sexual harassment. THAT is why courting is gone.

Unfortunately, it almost has to be this way, or men could defend legitimate sexual harassment with the excuse of "courting."

Robert_XX 07-27-2005 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
If your advances are refused at any point, you are not making "unwanted advances" and there are "unheeded declines." In doing so, you've created the "hostile environment" specified in the act, and are guilty of sexual harassment. THAT is why courting is gone.

Unfortunately, it almost has to be this way, or men could defend legitimate sexual harassment with the excuse of "courting."

Why all this legalistic argument? If you're even a half-way sensitive individual and there's mutual respect between the parties, you'll know the difference between "no, but by all means try harder" and "no, i really want you to stop this". And there are ways of suggesting you're still interested other than simply repeating the words "will you go out with me?" ad nauseum.

Personally I'm probably oversensitive to a 'no' and have too much pride to keep trying, but it depends entirely on the manner of the rebuff and how much I feel I'm being pissed around. I have in the past given girls more than one chance. In the case of a particularly hot babe I allowed myself to be stood up three times before I pulled the plug for good.

I seriously doubt that there really was a golden age of courting, and would bet that it's largely a myth from film and literature.

World's King 07-27-2005 11:45 AM

Just stay out of the bush in front of her house.

denim 07-27-2005 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert_XX
Why all this legalistic argument? If you're even a half-way sensitive individual and there's mutual respect between the parties, you'll know the difference between "no, but by all means try harder" and "no, i really want you to stop this". And there are ways of suggesting you're still interested other than simply repeating the words "will you go out with me?" ad nauseum.

That's key, fer shur. One person recently turned me down in the other way, and I've let her be. Different situation, different person. You can't really make relationships into some kind of no brainer. They require thought.

Jinn 07-27-2005 12:00 PM

Quote:

Why all this legalistic argument?
Because I'm not so niave to think that a "woman" wouldn't change her mind in a heart beat and go from "consenting" to "non-consenting" if it means a fat check in her back pocket.

Nonwithstanding the fact that saying "no" when you really mean "yes, pursue me more" is fucking ridiculous, it opens the reciever up for legal liability. If I were having sex with a girl and she were screaming "NO! NO! NO!" in a moaning, pleasured, ecstatic way.. I'd stop. She said no, if I keep going.. I'm raping her. Even if she's consenting now. You keep going man.. and in 5 years when your relationship is on the rocks you'll be having a sharply dressed prick at your door with a court summons. Don't be so niave as to think it can't happen.

(that's why I think courting has died, for me)

Janey 07-27-2005 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leto
What? You mean "ASL?" isn't enough courtship?

:lol:

it's enough for me!

Xazy 07-27-2005 12:22 PM

My wife first said no to me (when I proposed, well technically maybe even 2 times), but after stalking her, I began to grow on her like fungus. Needless to say happily married for almost 2 years now (6 1/2 years since first date).

Ustwo 07-27-2005 01:26 PM

Time is precious.

If a woman expects me to possibly waste it chasing after her, despite a string of 'no'es just because she wants to play hard to get she has another thing comming to her. My guess is such a woman would be high maintenance and by chasing after her you have set an awful presidence for the rest of the relationship.

Low maintenance = good.

Jinn 07-27-2005 02:01 PM

So, it turns out I'm a bit hyprocritical. It came to my attention today that my girlfriend did in fact say "No." when I asked her out the first time. So, in reality, ..well... I got nothin'.

But still.. uhh.. don't let a girl lead you down a road of No's.. yea...

Robert_XX 07-27-2005 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
Nonwithstanding the fact that saying "no" when you really mean "yes, pursue me more" is fucking ridiculous, it opens the reciever up for legal liability. If I were having sex with a girl and she were screaming "NO! NO! NO!" in a moaning, pleasured, ecstatic way.. I'd stop. She said no, if I keep going.. I'm raping her. Even if she's consenting now. You keep going man.. and in 5 years when your relationship is on the rocks you'll be having a sharply dressed prick at your door with a court summons. Don't be so niave as to think it can't happen.

But it hasn't happened! Not to me, not to anyone I know, in the 20 years of my adult life. Not one sexual shenanigan has ever ended up in court. So it's just not something I ever think about. I don't think that's naive (note spelling ;) ).

World's King 07-27-2005 02:45 PM

Nothing like lying to yourself.

Suave 07-27-2005 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by genuinegirly
I don't know that sexual harassment has much to do with it. My real question is: Was the age-old ideal of courting a reality? Or was it just a fantasy laid out by women who longed for a man (or men) to chase after her? I have made some love interests insane by requesting a "courting" mentality: was this ever something that men would try? I'd love to know if this truly is a lost art.

It was a fantasy created in around the 16th century by male poets/bards who had nothing better to do than dream up the whole concept of romanticism. Until that point, no one had any illusions about the state of relationships, and having candle-lit dinners with flowers were not required.

JoseFlanders 07-27-2005 07:26 PM

asdf
 
asfd

little_tippler 07-28-2005 04:09 AM

Sometimes when you're really "in love" with someone, no isn't going to stop you trying again. Sometimes you just know that person is the one for you. My SO's sister knew her husband for years at school and he was younger than her, and always pestering her to go out with him. She thought he was an annoying brat. They became friends of sorts, then close friends, and then one day she suddenly thought....oh I think I...like him actually. And now they're married. They're in their 20's. So. Romance and courtship aren't dead.

Sometimes no is no, but other times it's just no, it's not the right time. Eh harrassment...come on. Unless the person intrudes in your life significantly...

Daoust 07-28-2005 04:46 AM

Is this thread about courting or about the legality of 'no means no'? I'm going to discuss the former.

Quote:

Originally Posted by guccilvr
I don't think "courting" is dead. I think it just advances more rapidly now. In the old days (yes I use that term lightly) it was a drawn out process almost like a job interview. In todays society, people move and respond at a much faster pace and don't have time for all the "application" types of rituals.

While I too agree that courting is dead (and I consider courting and dating to mean different things, but by dating I mean exclusively dating the same person over a period of time) I think that dating is very important if what you're looking for a long term relationship that ends in marriage or mutual exclusivity.

My wife and I dated for close to four years before we got married. After a few months of dating we realized we wanted to get married, but we weren't ready, or able at that time. Our aim and intention was to get married, so we used the dating time to get to know one another, to ensure that if we were to get married we would be compatable. For close to one full year of those four years of dating the two of us were at least 15 hours away from each other, and we remained in contact solely through the phone, e-mail, and letters. I believe that period was crucial for us. We actually learned about each other. We were able to express our feelings, thoughts etc. in a different way than if we were in the same room. Not to say that we preferred this method all the time (obviously we'd rather have been together), but while it was our circumstance we made the most of it, and really found it to be a good thing for us.

I realize my circumstances are different than most. I realize that dating and relationships have changed a lot over the last generation. But I just thought that I would add that some people still date, and enter into long term relationships with the intention of marrying that person one day.

minyn 07-28-2005 08:01 AM

Its possible. i shot down the guy i am now with after he hit on me horribly. but he pulled the friends attitude and god that is amazing when it happens.

persistance, within reason, has the capacity to overcome. if she's worth it, youll know.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360