Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-26-2004, 10:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Politics on the info-superhighway

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,...opstories_html

This story has some important aspects to it, even though it is nothing resembling an in-depth report. But it can serve to start a discussion regarding the current use and potential of the Internet and candidates' web sites in particular.

The article is pretty balanced, since it's really web-designers' views that are highlighted - very critical. But the fact is, John Kerry has used his web site to gain a record amount of Internet donations flowing to his campaign. Since that's a high volume cash register he has there, I'd say he's using the web successfully at this point.
__________________
create evolution

Last edited by ARTelevision; 07-26-2004 at 10:37 AM..
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 11:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
This vexes me. I am terribly vexed.
 
Superbelt's Avatar
 
Location: Grantville, Pa
I like it, it brings the elections back down to the american people, like Campaign Finance Reform intended it to be.
It's one of the two biggest gifts Dean gave the democratic party. A way to energize the base and equalize the funding disparity between D and R.
Because of the net and online fundraising efforts via blogs I've sent donations to congressional and senate candidates that I agree with, that may not be anywhere near me but be viable candidates. These races have been specifically targeted by major party organizers like Markos Zuniga of dailykos as races that leave the incumbent vulnerable. It's seen as being able to take a seat from someone who doesn't deserve it. I have donated to candidates in Ohio, Colorado and of course Penna.
It's a good way to smartly direct money rather than just pour it in impotent campaigns. And in bulk force like kos does, it actually gets the candidate to listen to us.

Last edited by Superbelt; 07-26-2004 at 11:05 AM..
Superbelt is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 11:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Allen, TX
It seems John Kerry's site is newly re-faced in the last couple days, but sticks with the peaceful/positive atmosphere. It does seem easier to navigate now.

Bush's reminds me more of a Headline News kind of approach with a lot of activity and things jumping out at you.

I guess it seems like Kerry's is kind of open for you to explore and seek what you want to find, while Bush's puts what it desires out for you to find. Both are navigable for those that want to.
__________________
"Don't tell me we're so blind we cannot see that this is my land! I can't pretend that it's nothing to do with me.
And this is your land, you can't close your eyes to this hypocracy.
Yes this is my land, I won't pretend that it's nothing to do with me.
'Cause this is our land, we can't close our eyes to the things we don't wanna see."

- DTH
jb2000 is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 11:10 AM   #4 (permalink)
Huggles, sir?
 
seretogis's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
AHEM!

Quote:
Unleashing the Web Police
By Adam L. Penenberg

02:00 AM Jul. 26, 2004 PT

Marshall McLuhan, "the medium is the message" messenger, once observed, "Mud sometimes gives the illusion of depth." Which is relevant, I suppose, because in campaignland there's plenty of mud and precious little depth. Still, it is instructive to watch the presidential campaign play out on the candidates' websites.

On his website, President Bush has adopted a slash-and-burn strategy for his re-election run. He probably figured the strategy works so well as an environmental policy. More to the point, he knows it doomed Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) in the 2000 Republican race. On the GeorgeWBush.com splash page last week, amid social-issue iconography; a plug for a cyberchat with the president's party-girl daughters; and click-through tabs for "Economy," "Compassion" and "Homeland Security," sat a shaded box labeled "John Kerry: The Raw Deal." It read: "As part of his extreme makeover, Kerry announces his support for the doctrine of pre-emption he repeatedly denounced."

That's far from the only anti-Kerry rhetoric. Site visitors can download TV ads running in swing states that assail the Massachusetts Democrat's family values and political integrity. There are clever gimmicks like the "Kerry gas tax calculator" ("How much more would he cost you?") and the "John Kerry travel tracker" ("See why John Kerry is wrong for your state"). The blog announces in a press release, er, blog entry that the Bush campaign is moving its 24-hour-a-day war room to Boston for the week, "ready to respond to every misstatement, flip-flop and reckless attack."

What is Kerry & Co.'s response? It seems they prefer to project a positive image -- at least for now. They don't even acknowledge the partisan attacks. Instead, we get "America's Freedom Trail," in which we learn Kerry plans to "travel from his birthplace to the birthplace of America on his way to accepting the Democratic Party's nomination." There's the Kerry-Edwards "Opportunity Agenda" -- targeted to the middle class, natch. A "Brother in Arms" touts military vets, while a "Commitment to Education" announces a plan to fully fund "No Child Left Behind." Heavy on promises, short on specifics, it's a paean to lofty political rhetoric.

But the jury is still out on whether Kerry can define himself for voters before Bush and Cheney do it for him -- in cyberspace and beyond. (And if you are part of the crowd that can't stomach either candidate, this click is for you.)

In the end, it may not matter what kind of information appears on the candidates' websites, as long as they have a cool design. So says a 2002 Stanford study called "How Do People Evaluate a Web Site's Credibility?" commissioned by Consumer WebWatch, which is affiliated with Consumer Reports. Although most Americans claim to know which factors to weigh when attempting to gauge a website's credibility, it appears they don't. The Stanford study showed that people are frequently "distracted by superficial aspects of sites that had little to do with the depth, breadth or the quality of the content." Nearly half of the study's participants -- about 46 percent -- rated a site's credibility based primarily on its design or look.

Since 15,035 members of the media, including 35 bloggers, have been sucked into the vortex of convention coverage in Boston, I decided to round up some Web designers and writers to sample some political websites like those belonging to our commander in chief and his chief challenger. Sorry, Ralph. No free publicity here.

For inspiration, I turned to US Weekly's famously mean "Fashion Police" spread, in which a gaggle of comedians, fashionistas and pop-culture reporters bash celebrities' wardrobe choices. A recent one on Mariah Carey included comments like, "This dress eliminates the need to stand over a blowing vent" and "Victoria has a secret. Mariah does not."

I asked my witty Web posse, consisting of Alexander Robinson of Adro Design; Mark Tuchman, creator of the parody site Dumbanddubya.com; graphic illustrator Bob Eckstein; writer Kurt Opprecht; and blogger Waldo Jaquith to take their best shots at:

The incumbent: President George W. Bush
Robinson: "Who is Bush's art director, Old Glory?"
Jaquith: "Consistent with his administration's standards, Bush's blog permits no public comment."
Tuchman: "GeorgeWBush.com renders Bush parody sites like mine redundant."
Opprecht: "Is that the Grinch on the homepage?"

The challenger: John Kerry
Opprecht: "Theresa Heinz Kerry gets billing above John Edwards? Look out, it's the Hillary plan!"
Tuchman: "This website perfectly captures the candidate: uninspiring, monotonous, convoluted."
Eckstein: "Looks like it was thrown together faster than his decision to pick Edwards. It will probably change by next week -- the website and/or running mate."
Robinson: "This site navigates like a sinking ship. One page lists the link 'One Hundred Days to Change America.' How many days will it take to find this link from the homepage?"

Senate majority leader: Bill Frist (R-Tennessee)
Eckstein: "(This) website has the aesthetics of a phone bill. Good use of repeating dull photograph, though."
Robinson: "The graphics remind me of Fat Elvis: Tennessee icons meet pharmaceuticals."
Tuchman: "The top banner graphic showing a Tennessee Titan, mountain and guitar is more appealing than a logo consisting of a stack of assault rifles, an illegal abortion and oil-drilling rig."

Senate minority leader: Tom Daschle (D-South Dakota)
Tuchman: "Very informative. I learned he is still a senator. Note to webmaster: Change the typo at top where it says Democratic 'Leader.'"
Eckstein: "This website sums up why nobody cares about South Dakota."
Robinson: "I feel like I just stepped in a cow patty."

Worst Senate website: James Jeffords (I-Vermont)
Jaquith: "I didn't know anybody still used Dreamweaver."
Opprecht: "Don't they have the Internet in Vermont?"

Worst House website: Mac Collins (R-Georgia)
Tuchman: "Best viewed with Netscape Navigator v.2.0, and 9,600-bps modem."
Robinson: "The site kindly told me, 'We have attempted to make this site as accessible as possible,' but didn't support my browser (Safari)."

Have your own nominees for worst website by an elected official? E-mail me and I'll publish the best (or worst) ones.
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames

Last edited by seretogis; 07-26-2004 at 11:12 AM..
seretogis is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 11:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Thanks. I certainly might have made it easier to access...doh!

Sorry 'bout that.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 12:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
The article is a little off-base, as it focuses on the personal websites of politicians rather than the unofficially affiliated sites that are the real drivers of the net-politico phenomenon (blogs, for example). Nit-picking aside, almost anything that helps individuals to become more personally active with politics is a positive in my book.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 01:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Allen, TX
Quote:
Originally posted by cthulu23
The article is a little off-base, as it focuses on the personal websites of politicians rather than the unofficially affiliated sites that are the real drivers of the net-politico phenomenon (blogs, for example). Nit-picking aside, almost anything that helps individuals to become more personally active with politics is a positive in my book.

I think though, the intent of the article was not to go into the impact of political websites on American Democracy, but instead a web-design critique on the personal websites of politicians. Sure, you could do the same with any other political sites, but as much influence as they may have, nothing better illustrates a candidate's/campaign's own perspective of their internet presence than their own site.
__________________
"Don't tell me we're so blind we cannot see that this is my land! I can't pretend that it's nothing to do with me.
And this is your land, you can't close your eyes to this hypocracy.
Yes this is my land, I won't pretend that it's nothing to do with me.
'Cause this is our land, we can't close our eyes to the things we don't wanna see."

- DTH
jb2000 is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 02:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
Yes. I think the best thing about these sites is the fact that they're out there - and like most things on the Net, allow a more direct and interactive relationship with users and content providers than was available in the past.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
 

Tags
infosuperhighway, politics

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360