|
View Poll Results: For yours or Against theirs | |||
I generally vote for my candidate | 27 | 64.29% | |
I generally vote against the opposing candidate | 15 | 35.71% | |
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
01-22-2004, 07:50 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Psycho
Location: NC
|
Honesty time!
This is a quick poll to help expound on a deeper question.
When you vote...are you truly voting for YOUR candidate? OR...are you voting AGAINST the opposition? I hear more and more people telling me what they don't like in each other's candidates and parties, without revealing what they like about theirs. So when you hit the polling places, are you voting FOR someone in particular? Or, are you just trying to keep the other side out. I realize that in this information age we get far too much info on these candidates; but.... DAMN!...will there ever be another candidate that we can have some true confidence in? Not just more confidence than with the rival? Cynically yours, Sticky
__________________
The sad thing is... as you get older you come to realize that you don't so much pilot your life, as you just try to hold on, in a screaming, defiant ball of white-knuckle anxious fury |
01-22-2004, 08:58 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Mencken
Location: College
|
It really depends on how cynical you are I suppose. We tend not to think that somone can do good, even if they're our guy, but at the same time we believe that not only does the other guy have bad intentions, but also the capacity to actually cause bad things to happen.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention." |
01-22-2004, 10:39 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
Hmmm
About 50/50 on the poll and that is how I have been voting lately too. This presidential election will definitely be the lesser of two evils.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
01-23-2004, 06:37 AM | #7 (permalink) |
will always be an Alyson Hanniganite
Location: In the dust of the archives
|
Both actually.
Sometimes I'll vote for the candidate because I completely support him/her. Yet, just as often, I'll vote for a candidate, not so much out of support, but because I am vehemently against the opposition.
__________________
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires." - Susan B. Anthony "Hedonism with rules isn't hedonism at all, it's the Republican party." - JumpinJesus It is indisputable that true beauty lies within...but a nice rack sure doesn't hurt. |
01-23-2004, 07:11 AM | #9 (permalink) |
Walking is Still Honest
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Depends on how big the difference in quality between the two candidates is.
I'll likely think Bush to be significantly better than the dem, and thus vote against the dem. But otherwise, I'd vote for the libertarian (or whatever third party candidate seems best). edit: Actually, there may yet be the possibility that I'll consider Bush to be the best candidate, and not just the best major candidate. I don't like the Libertarian stance on the war in Iraq or on abortion.
__________________
I wonder if we're stuck in Rome. |
01-23-2004, 09:40 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
|
It depends on the election. In local elections i always vote for my candidate, while in national elections i am generally more inclined to vote against the other candidate.
Just like the framers of the constitution intended. |
01-23-2004, 11:17 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Addict
Location: Illinois
|
I will be a first time voter this year, and I've got to say that I will probably be voting for my candidate (whoever it is) because of both reasons. Now, I do realize that seems like a cop out answer, but it's mostly the truth. I do have some issues with some of the Democrate candidates at this point, but would definitely vote for Clark/Dean/Edwards/Kerry (probably in that order) before Bush any day. I see very little good Bush is doing for this country, and any new face in the White House would be so much better for the nation at this point.
So yes, I'd be voting for both possible motives you have stated. |
01-23-2004, 01:17 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Adrift
Location: Wandering in the Desert of Life
|
Generally speaking, I vote for MY candidate. On occation, I have voted against someone rather that for someone, but it is rare. I recently voted for someone who I wanted out of office, because the individual who was of my party was a complete joke, so I guess I won't vote for someone just because I dislike their opponent. Whomever I vote for needs to be qualified, just in case they do win.
__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -Douglas Adams |
01-23-2004, 01:54 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Dubya
Location: VA
|
I always vote for my candidate in primaries. As for the general election...
__________________
"In Iraq, no doubt about it, it's tough. It's hard work. It's incredibly hard. It's - and it's hard work. I understand how hard it is. I get the casualty reports every day. I see on the TV screens how hard it is. But it's necessary work. We're making progress. It is hard work." |
01-29-2004, 07:19 PM | #18 (permalink) |
Industrialist
Location: Southern California
|
It has been a while since I felt any connection to a candidate. Most of the time, it is the lesser of two evils that I have to try and cope with, so it is unfortunitly the second.
I wish I had a candidate to believe in again. I miss Ronnie....
__________________
All truth passes through three stages: First it is ridiculed Second, it is violently opposed and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER (1788-1860) |
01-30-2004, 09:13 AM | #20 (permalink) | |
Super Agitator
Location: Just SW of Nowhere!!! In the good old US of A
|
Quote:
__________________
Life isn't always a bowl of cherries, sometimes it's more like a jar of Jalapenos --- what you say or do today might burn your ass tomorrow!!! |
|
Tags |
honesty, time |
|
|