12-04-2003, 06:17 AM | #41 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Quote:
Point 1, I'm absolutely in agreement on. But a response mechanism is not the same as a defense. The longer the MAD argument exists, the less likely I feel it will be effective. When people live under a certain threat for long enough they begin to disregard its implications or ramifications. At some point someone will find the response an "acceptable risk" to achieve their goals. Whether these are terrorists, a militant faction within an existing country, or whatever. Point 2, I don't need any stat. Again I agree with you. The ports are ridiculously unprotected. Just as are many other areas. They should be a priority just like a missile defense. In all truth, I think the ports will be at least as complicated as a missile defense. Missile defense needs to deal with vast numbers of targets and port defense will need to deal with an even more vast number of targets. I'll start a new thread about the New Zealand guy. Sometimes, I just assume that all the minutia rattling around in my head is known to everyone, that's why I often fail to post links when I first mention something.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
|
Tags |
bush, spending |
|
|