Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   three cheers for socialism (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/114134-three-cheers-socialism.html)

dksuddeth 03-07-2007 02:00 AM

three cheers for socialism
 
for all of you who wish to 'socialize' the united states....this is a taste of whats coming. don't say you weren't warned.

France bans 'citizen' journalists from reporting violence

banning civilian journalism   click to show 

Etarip 03-07-2007 03:52 AM

And what, exactly does the socialist economic model have to do with government censorship?

dksuddeth 03-07-2007 04:27 AM

socialism leads to communism. It's inevitable. government censorship must be utilized in order to hide the many negatives of socialism. It will eventually lead to an erosion of civil rights....much like most of England already has.

dc_dux 03-07-2007 04:53 AM

Bush and the Repub Congress took the first step down that road when Congress passed and Bush signed the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, which increased the penalties for violations by TV broadcasters of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, indecent, and profane material.

The bill was initiated by social conservatives outrage over the "indecent" Janet Jackson nipple exposure incident that may have traumatized America's children. There were additional bills still pending in the Repub Congress last year:
Quote:

There are currently two indecency bills pending, one in the Senate, another in the house; the FCC has increased fines to stations that air indecent programming, and is proposing for the first time fines to individual performers for violations in addition to levies against the offending broadcast organizations.
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/02/125836.php

ratbastid 03-07-2007 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dksuddeth
socialism leads to communism. It's inevitable. government censorship must be utilized in order to hide the many negatives of socialism. It will eventually lead to an erosion of civil rights....much like most of England already has.

I don't even know where to start with this. There's SO much wrong with this statement.

First of all, you're confusing Communism with Fascism. Socialism is an economic system. Communism is a political system. Fascism is a control system. I know in conservativeland all apparently-bad things are linked together and arise simultaneously and as mutual causes of each other, but in reality they're not interchangeable. The most aggressively censoring government the world has ever known wasn't Socialist or Communist at all, despite the name "National Socialist Party". The Nazis had a more brutal clamp-down on the media than even Soviet Russia had.

I also dispute your assertion that "socialism leads to communism". First of all, the evil of Communism isn't at all self-evident, despite what McCarthy had to say about it. Second, there are LOTS of countries in the world with Socialist-leaning agendas both economically and socially. The vast majority of them are very successful Democracies.

Finally: if you're really that worried about civil rights, go demand the impeachment of your current President. He's done more to destroy civil rights than any leader in American history, and more than most leaders in the history of the world.

pig 03-07-2007 05:16 AM

so the question is, are the french people going to raise hell over this? i've seen those guys go ape shit in the streets before over worker's rights and so forth. after all the chicanery with the north african immigrants burning and looting a while back, i'm curious if the "native" french population will reject or support this measure? didn't i see that an increasing number had voted for le pen / national front recently?

regardless, dk, thanks for the information. i'm fairly certain i don't agree that i don't agree that this is related to socialism / socialized health care/retirement/etc. i would say that you can take any form of government and make it oppressive, and such measures will follow. people in power like to be in power, increase their power, and so forth. that's not a function of government style, that's a fact of life.

shakran 03-07-2007 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dksuddeth
socialism leads to communism. It's inevitable. government censorship must be utilized in order to hide the many negatives of socialism. It will eventually lead to an erosion of civil rights....much like most of England already has.


If you're going to spread lies, at least try to make them plausible. Socialism does not lead to communism. Period. Ask Sweden.

Furthermore, if you're going to spread lies about socialism, try not to take a toddler viewpoint on it. Very few things are all bad, and very few things are all good. No one (here, that I know of) is trying to suggest that the US become entirely socialist. However, in certain areas, socialist concepts can be applied nicely.

And England isn't socialist or communist, it's a parlimentary representative democracy with a capitalist economy.

So far with the exception of your name, your entire statement is false, misleading, and absurd. Got anything else for us?

connyosis 03-07-2007 07:06 AM

Yes, we have a socialist system here. No, we're not communist. Yes, we're allowed to say whatever we want. (And even show boobs and curse on national TV, imagine that!)

Charlatan 03-07-2007 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by connyosis
Yes, we have a socialist system here. No, we're not communist. Yes, we're allowed to say whatever we want. (And even show boobs and curse on national TV, imagine that!)

Bloody Brilliant!

That's what I love about this place, someone makes a very weak statement about censorship and ecomomic policies that have little or nothing to do with each other, a few people tear it (rightly so) to shreads and then someone comes in with nice (and comical) coup de grace.

I love it when a thread comes together.

The_Jazz 03-07-2007 07:27 AM

Wait, someone explain how this effects me? I'm not French, nor have I ever been (to the best of my knowledge). I don't even think I can manage to read French anymore, so I couldn't read these blogs anyway.

And what in the world does this have to do with socialism? I sort of feel like Mogatu at the end of "Zoolander" with this thread. Am I taking crazy pills?

flstf 03-07-2007 08:21 AM

Quote:

During parliamentary debate of the law, government representatives said the offense of filming or distributing films of acts of violence targets the practice of “happy slapping,” in which a violent attack is filmed by an accomplice, typically with a camera phone, for the amusement of the attacker’s friends.
As we have seen so often in the past from governments (including our own) the cure is worse than the illness. I imagine there are quite a few in our country who would like some restrictions put on private citizen video recording especially of our police in action.

A government doesn't have to be socialist to pass what many of us perceive as laws that go too far in restricting our freedom.

ironman 03-07-2007 08:21 AM

Last time i checked, most of the countries in the HDI's top 10 are socially oriented.

Willravel 03-07-2007 08:28 AM

This is what's wrong with people talking about politics. They decide some thing's a bad thing, then attribute everything bad to it.

Socialism has absolutely nothing to do with censorship, and Communism isn't out to get anyone. McCarthy was a cruel idiot, and anyone who follows his philosophy is living in the wrong decade.

pig 03-07-2007 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Am I taking crazy pills?

Sounds like someone needs an ORANGE MOCHA FRAPPACINO!!!.

connyosis 03-07-2007 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dksuddeth
socialism leads to communism. It's inevitable. government censorship must be utilized in order to hide the many negatives of socialism. It will eventually lead to an erosion of civil rights....much like most of England already has.

Wow...just wow. I better tell my neighbours that we do not have any rights anymore, that is if I have time before Stasi breaks through my door and arrests me for inciting a rebellion against our glorious government.

kutulu 03-07-2007 01:20 PM

I've seen you make some crazy connections but this trumps all of them. Ridiculous.

Willravel 03-07-2007 02:41 PM

DKsuddeth: Read the wikipedia article on socialism before you put your foot in your mouth again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

It's a well written article and will clear up any confusion.

lom 03-07-2007 02:42 PM

I dont think I can really add to what others have said but it worries me that someone would post these kinds of connections even in a jovial context. Is this really the naive view held by people across the pond? It stinks of 1980's propaganda against the Soviet Union. I would have hoped in 2007 noone would still be so easily influenced.

Etarip 03-07-2007 03:09 PM

America's big enough that the edges of the bell curve extend further into radical areas on both edges of the spectrum. Plus we do seem to still be dealing with the remnants of anti-Soviet propaganda, for example look at our continued treatment of Cuba. Also few American's have traveled abroad and have first hand experience under different political systems.

duck0987 03-26-2007 06:46 PM

Thank god we are in america where we have no censorship over what the media can show. Like Boobs at the superbowl, or coffins draped with american flags coming back from Iraq. For a country that claims to be founded on Christ like ideals, we sure know how to fuck the poor by not giving them healthcare. Jesus was a socialist no way around that one.

samcol 03-26-2007 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duck0987
Thank god we are in america where we have no censorship over what the media can show. Like Boobs at the superbowl, or coffins draped with american flags coming back from Iraq. For a country that claims to be founded on Christ like ideals, we sure know how to fuck the poor by not giving them healthcare. Jesus was a socialist no way around that one.

Wrong. Huge difference between government extracting money from citizens to redistribute wealth and willfully making the individual choice to do so. The difference is freewill. Christ was breaking more laws in the bible than he was following.

Rekna 03-26-2007 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samcol
Christ was breaking more laws in the bible than he was following.


That is a pretty bold statement and I don't want to derail this thread but I totally disagree with this statement and I'm sure most biblical scholars would agree with me.

Astrocloud 03-26-2007 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rekna
That is a pretty bold statement and I don't want to derail this thread but I totally disagree with this statement and I'm sure most biblical scholars would agree with me.

:rolleyes:
Sure, declaring yourself the messiah -doesn't go against Rabbinical laws. Seems like you should have another thread somewhere.

Rekna 03-26-2007 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Astrocloud
:rolleyes:
Sure, declaring yourself the messiah -doesn't go against Rabbinical laws. Seems like you should have another thread somewhere.

It doesn't if you are actually the messiah.... The old testament (which contains the torah). predicted the coming of the messiah so someone claiming it would not be against
the laws if they were really who they said they were.

I agree that we should have another thread if we want to discuss this further but unfortunately there is no good forum to put it in and starting a thread on this would ultimately lead to endless Christian bashing.

filtherton 03-27-2007 08:35 AM

:rolleyes: Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum, c'mon guys. Like, orbiting teapots, and shit.

roachboy 03-27-2007 08:49 AM

the problem with this thread should be obvious: dk is conflating a poorly written french law with the word socialism. he demonstrably has at best a loose grip on what socialism is: in this case it primarily refers to "that which i do not like."
the underlying assumption appears to be an argument from elective affinity, and the "data" amounts to an assumption that socialists have a monpoly on poorly written law (patriot act anyone?)

the premise of the thread is incoherent, so the discussion that follows cant really help but be incoherent as well. read the thread. qed.

ubertuber 03-27-2007 08:52 AM

Lame thread, and threadjacked to boot. I'll reopen if someone can PM me with some sort of compelling, or at least half-way rational reason to do so.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47