Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Motors


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-06-2003, 02:59 PM   #41 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Diego, CA.
Well, i dont know about the possibilities of the renesis, but with the changes they made to teh engine, once people start turboing it, it should hopefully put out phenomenal power. Mazda very well might offer a turbo later on, as well as rumors of an RX-7 return. They didn't put the turbo on their now though, primarily for cost. Their goal is a powerful, fun to drive sports car at a reasonable to low cost. If this one takes off i have no doubt that in a few years there will be turbo models from the factory.

Also, most people are putting down right about 190rwhp, not 170. At least from all the reports i've seen...
__________________
Dont cry kid, It's not your fault you suck.
Peryn is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 08:22 PM   #42 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
Quote:
Originally posted by madsenj37
Its fits four people in it.
...if you like sitting in back with your feet under, yes under, the front seats....and yes thats not just if youre tall...its definitely designed that way...

Quote:
Originally posted by madsenj37
Mazda was given the"Engine of the year" award for its new rotary engine, the Renesis.
...because its new. Period. Anything new wins awards.

And as far as the realiability, rotary engines are by nature very touchy pieces of machinery. Talk to an RX-7 owner sometime about the tuning nightmares that come with a rotary engine. In other words, they are a motor dependant on balance....and once that balance gets thrown off (which it inevitably will) even just a little, it is HELL trying to get it back, and the engine is almost never the same.

Dont get me wrong, I think the RX-8 looks cool, and I do like the idea of the rotary engine, but its implementation leaves something to be desired....

190hp? for $32k or more? cmon....
bad30th is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 08:23 PM   #43 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
lol sorry i didnt mean to pick on you madsenj37 yours were just the comments i noticed first hehe
bad30th is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 09:52 AM   #44 (permalink)
Still searching...
 
madsenj37's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal For Life
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
lol sorry i didnt mean to pick on you madsenj37 yours were just the comments i noticed first hehe
No worries, no harm done. Honestly though, the problems that plagued other owners of rotaries, minus the balancing issue, have supposedly been taken care of. As for four people, I own one, and it does fit four people, better than most two door sports cars. As soon as I got it my friends and I went on a road trip to Reno, which was a four drive for us. It was better than my old 2 door bmw by far. Now granted only one of us was over 6 feet.
__________________
"Only two things are certain: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not certain about the universe."
-- Albert Einstein

Last edited by madsenj37; 10-08-2003 at 11:43 PM..
madsenj37 is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 10:08 AM   #45 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
So you do actually own one...congrats

How does it pull up top? They are supposed to have insane top end.....
bad30th is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 12:19 PM   #46 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Quote:
Originally posted by stingc
Why do people make hp/displacement arguments?
Because they matter. Honda, Toyota, and BMW all ship 100 HP/litre engines these days. The epitome of V8 performance in the part of the world are cars like the Monaro coupe, which make around 330 HP out of a 5.7 V8. The BMW M3 makes that out of a 3.3 litre engine. The new gen Toyota Supras are again, in that ball park, with normally aspirated 3.5 litre sixes.

Smaller, lighter engines = lighter car. So the same HP gets you better performance, to boot.
rodgerd is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 02:37 PM   #47 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Quote:
Smaller, lighter engines = lighter car. So the same HP gets you better performance, to boot.
Simple V8's don't weigh much anymore since they're all aluminum now in performance models. All the technical gadgets thrown on to other engines to make them get high power/displacement ratios make them heavier. The real world advantages are small if any:

"Old" tech:
5.7 L LS1 or LS6: 350 or 405 hp respectively. 400 lb long block

7.0 L ZL1 (1969): ~5-600 hp. 500 lb (very few were originally built, but all the parts to make a new one are easily found).

New Tech:
3.4 L 1998 911 Carrera engine: 300 hp. 400 lb

3.6 L 1995 911 Turbo engine: 410 hp. 600 lb (!)

I'm can't find M3 or Supra engine weights, but I doubt they're much different.

You also bring up the physical size of an engine, which I don't see as being much different for any of the engines you mentioned. RWD cars mount their engines longitudinally, so underhood length, not width is most important. Both the supra and BMW are inline 6's, so they require similar space to a V12. Not exactly compact.

I admire the engineering acomplishments on european and japanese engines, but I'd admire them much more if they applied the same technology to a larger displacement engine. Turbos are also good though
stingc is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 02:40 PM   #48 (permalink)
Still searching...
 
madsenj37's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal For Life
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th
So you do actually own one...congrats

How does it pull up top? They are supposed to have insane top end.....
Thanks. the top is impressive. It goes through the rpm meter like it is nothing once your above 6-7. I havent kept over 7 for a long time since I still feel like I am breaking it in eventhough I have about 3x the recomended break in mileage.
__________________
"Only two things are certain: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not certain about the universe."
-- Albert Einstein
madsenj37 is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 04:21 PM   #49 (permalink)
Insane
 
I liked it in photos, liked it better in person, and liked it even more when I drove it. I didn't like the digital speedo, and the $2000 dvd nav, but I'm definitely picking one up. Nordic Green
Cocktopus is offline  
Old 10-08-2003, 02:05 PM   #50 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Location: San Diego, CA.
StingC ... you didn't throw in the numbers / advantages of teh rotary in there. It is in a class all its own.

13b turbo with all the piping. Can hit 500hp without too many problems. About 250lbs or less. Thats longblock power at half teh weight. That is a significant difference. When you consider its used in cars built for handling, not straight lines, you get even more advantage. Unlike the v8's or i6's you are talking about, they are much shorter and lower. This puts the weight more toward the center of the car, and less around the edges, which leads to better handlign and center of gravity. That is why HP/L comparisons matter. though they all get thrown out teh window when teh rotary is considered. As for applying that same principle into larger displacement engines. Check out teh 20b. 2L of displacement, with another rotor. That gives you 3, rather than 2 rotors to make power, out of an engine about teh size of a v6. They also made an insano 4 rotor version for their LeMans car.
__________________
Dont cry kid, It's not your fault you suck.
Peryn is offline  
Old 10-09-2003, 03:05 PM   #51 (permalink)
Upright
 
My friends mom works for a mazda/subaru dealership, and she got to borrow an RX-8. We could NOT get it to burn out, dropping the clutch, everything. It may have HP, but no torque. No guts in the car.
inbeastic is offline  
Old 10-09-2003, 08:30 PM   #52 (permalink)
Still searching...
 
madsenj37's Avatar
 
Location: NorCal For Life
Quote:
Originally posted by bad30th

...because its new. Period. Anything new wins awards.

So are you saying that mazda had the only new engine on the market? Or are you perhaps saying that every new engine wins an award?

I believe that for instance the engine used in the 350 Z is new this year ... why did not it win?
__________________
"Only two things are certain: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not certain about the universe."
-- Albert Einstein
madsenj37 is offline  
Old 10-09-2003, 08:48 PM   #53 (permalink)
Insane
 
Location: [insert witty play on location field here]
because its not....drumroll please...............

The Return of the ROTARY!!!!!!!!!


oooo ahhhhhh ooooo

Thats why
bad30th is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 12:48 AM   #54 (permalink)
.
 
bundy's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo
now, i don´t know all that much about the ROTARY, but i´ve got to tell you all i´m loving this vehicle more and more each day.

not that i´ll be able to get behind the wheel of this sexy RX-8 anytime soon...
__________________
Ohayo!!!
bundy is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 12:53 AM   #55 (permalink)
Upright
 
Cool car, nice preformenance charges
johan is offline  
 

Tags
return, rotary, rx8


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360