12-03-2007, 02:53 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Please touch this.
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
|
Corporate Mergers - Activision and Blizzard merge
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071203/...ndi_activision
Quote:
We know, though, that when the world becomes less diversified, our options shrink and thus our world starts to look less like the vision in our head and more like the vision in some rich bastard's head. As individuals, is there a way to fight against the conglomerates? With 80% of all media (TV, Movies, Books, Magazines, Radio) being owned by 6 major corporations, it's impossible to open your eyes without looking at a product that was graciously provided to you by these powers. These powers who all work together, mind you, in the spirit of cooperation, not competition. Unless we grow our own food and cotton, and hire our nieces and nephews to sing and dance for us, nearly 80% of each dollar we spend makes its way into the pockets of these major corporations. (Which brings up an interesting question: do the Amish use USD when making transactions?) It isn't like what I've just written hasn't been written before, but I want to draw attention to the focus of these business mergers. They merge in the interest of profitability and market share, not customer satisfaction.
__________________
You have found this post informative. -The Administrator [Don't Feed The Animals] |
|
12-03-2007, 03:18 PM | #2 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: San Francisco
|
Quote:
Most of the corporate music and movies make me feel ill without even knowing where they came from. I listen to music almost exclusively from independent labels, not because it's from independent labels but because it's GOOD, and, well, I don't really watch movies, but when I do I'll buy classic used laserdiscs or go see an indie film. The major labels are already dying out. They're going to start merging because they HAVE to. The only way they will make money is back-catalogue licensing. That's why they're so desperate to avoid copyright reform, and they're panicking at the prospect of modern artists' termination rights becoming available in a few years. If copyright reform happens, they're out of business. This is the new age of entertainment, nobody controls distribution anymore, let the best art win.
__________________
"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded." --Abraham Lincoln Last edited by n0nsensical; 12-03-2007 at 03:28 PM.. |
|
12-03-2007, 04:47 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Wise-ass Latino
Location: Pretoria (Tshwane), RSA
|
I thought ActiVision folded years ago, or am I missing something?
__________________
Cameron originally envisioned the Terminator as a small, unremarkable man, giving it the ability to blend in more easily. As a result, his first choice for the part was Lance Henriksen. O. J. Simpson was on the shortlist but Cameron did not think that such a nice guy could be a ruthless killer. -From the Collector's Edition DVD of The Terminator |
12-03-2007, 04:54 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Lover - Protector - Teacher
Location: Seattle, WA
|
They're still around, but as a publisher moreso than a developer.
Just like SEGA. You fail hardcore at making game(s), so you decide to let someone ELSE develop them, and you just market and sell them. And I guess I don't subscribe to the whole "woe-is-me", anti-cosumerism anti-corporation mentality. I thought it was cool that they merged. Then again, I work for one of the largest software companies in the world. I say bring on our corporate overlords.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel |
12-03-2007, 04:57 PM | #7 (permalink) |
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
|
My problem is that Blizzard is this perfect developer. WoW alone is this magnificent accomplishment and will go down in video game history, but to also have Warcraft, Starcraft, Diablo, and Lost Vikings? That's a dynasty. Don't get me wrong, Activision is something. Mechwarrior was beyond perfect, but they lost that a long time ago.
|
12-03-2007, 07:09 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: Lake Mary, FL
|
This isn't nearly as bad as the Squaresoft-Enix merger (More like buyout). Now Square has infected a lot of Enix/Tri-Ace created games with mediocrity. But I digress...
__________________
I believe in equality; Everyone is equally inferior to me. |
12-03-2007, 10:44 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Winter is Coming
Location: The North
|
Blizzard was previously owned by industry favorite Vivendi, whose reputation in the industry is really no better than that of Activision, if not worse.
They maintained a great deal of autonomy and continued to produce a great product then. I see no reason why they won't continue to do so now. |
12-04-2007, 12:07 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Pickles
Location: Shirt and Pants (NJ)
|
From WoW main page.
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/index.xml Quote:
__________________
We Must Dissent. |
|
Tags |
activision, blizzard, corporate, merge, mergers |
|
|