Quote:
Originally posted by filtherton
Okay, so your saying that adam was, in fact, a baby? I'm not talking about a person who is young yet looks old. I'm talking about imbuing an object with a property it can not have because it is defined as having properties specifically different from said property.
I think we can all agree that god can lift anything with mass. A boulder has mass. It stands to reason that a boulder cannot exist that is too heavy for god to lift. If you want to argue that god can negate god's own omnipotence than than just remember:
Everything i say is a lie.
btw -3 is a real number. The square root of negative three is an imaginary number.
|
i'm not saying that dam was a baby baby, but if he was born a fully formed man, then technically, he was a baby. if a pregnant lady gave birth to a fully mature human, that person would physically be an adult, while still being a baby. but i guess that was just a bad example. the other ones mentioned were where an object was having a property it can't hve imbued to it, like a circular square, and those are impossible. but since a rock has mass, that would not make impossible.
i personally don't agree with the idea taht god can move anything ith mass (probably because i don't believe in god), but i think that would be a good answer to the question. i would think that it could be said that snce god is on a diff. plane of existence, beyond thephysical, that mass has no bearing (baring?) on him or his powers. but if god is subject to the laws of the universe that he created (assuming the laws are there because he was subject to them at creation, laws that affect all reality on all levels) then the questoin would of the rock would be valid, i think.
good call onthe -3. it's been too long sine i've taken any advanced math classes.