I disagree. Campaigns have their differing points, but the main pack has been eerily similar in their positions. Especially the Iraq war. Dean forced that issue. Dean also forced the energy into the campaign and he forced a backbone back into the democrats making it ok and necessary for a candidate to start attacking Bush's policies and telling america how much we need a change. None of that would be on the table without Dean.
We would be stuck with a heartless spineless Lieberman type who runs on the campaign of... Um... Vote for me because I agree with everything Bush does.
I honestly believe, without Howard having done what he did, neither Kerry nor Edwards would be in such a favorable position to win the Presidency.
I think Dean changed them both. And did it for the better so they feel the ability to stand up for what they really believe in again and not cower.
Last edited by Superbelt; 02-18-2004 at 12:49 PM..
|