Why do the court's always seem to miss the point on this particular set of cases. Guns don't kill people- people kill people. A gun by itself can not do anything on it's own. It takes an outside influence to make it fire, ie.... pull the trigger, drop on the hammer, or place in a situation that would cause corrosion to the ammunition. These cases would not show up in the court's if Tort reform was put in place across the US. If the law firm's had to pay damages to the defendant in cases that their firm's lost, you would see a lot fewer of these type's of cases. As long as they are shielded from these losses, they sue anybody they can think of, no matter the baselessness of the case.
__________________
When all else fails, QUIT.
|