Peryn, not one poster <i>has</i> explicitly agreed with this statement:
Quote:
Originally posted by Peryn
Completely ignoring the wording of the bill or where it could lead, does anyone actualy agree that the process should be allowed in any but the most dire of circumstances?
|
The point of JBX's lengthy and informative post above yours is that PBA is an <b>entirely fictitious procedure!</b> It has no basis in medical science, and therefore the use of the term in legislation that will soon be the law of the land (until its first court challenge, that is) is deceptive. I might also add that it is a fundamentally poor premise of discourse to attempt discussion of changes in the law without also discussing the wording of the legislation that would make the changes. The "wording of the bill" IS the bill. Failure to understand this betrays a lack of information regarding our country's method of government.