Yeah, I couldn't find anything on this at google or snopes, so I kind of question the utility of arguing about a hypothetical (and, frankly, unlikely) case.
Nonetheless, DUH the car company is not responsible. It's like suing a shoe manufacturer because your high heel broke and kept you from running away fast enough, or suing General Mills because their Cheerios did not in fact give you the energy to stay awake through your morning exams. It's such a "duh" case that I can't imagine it's the least bit true.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
|