The problem with articles (and ideas) like this is that they have no basis in fact. I'm not saying she's wrong, I'm just saying that a lot of intellectuals, particularly in the "cultural theory" side of the academic spectrum (where I got my MA and then ran screaming) get an idea that's based in theory and then go looking for anecdotal evidence of causation that matches that theory. This kind of crap would NEVER be tolerated in the hard sciences, why do we tolerate it here? She's saying that this is a particular aspect of reality: go prove it with data. When you can show me a causal link, then I'll crusade against porn as the death knell of healthy sexuality. Till then, I will continue to call "bullshit."
P.S. Fair disclosure: Naomi Wolf has always bugged the hell out of me. She takes a perfectly good idea and then ruins it by being whiny, unempirical (although The Beauty Myth came close to at least some kind of anecdotal empiricism) and completely un-helpful.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
|