Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
Now, however, it is a judge from Denver (that's in Colorado, the notorious home of fantastic skiing, and some pretty neat 'shall issue' legislation) who deemed the list uncostitutional on 1st ammendment grounds. That is, it restricted only certain types of speech, commercial solicitations, while placing no restrictions on political, charitible, or polling speech.
|
I don't even understand how he could consider it a first amendment issue. Commercial speech is not protected under the first ammendment as it isn't free speech. This was already proven when spam faxes were made illegal. I just don't understand the way some judges think sometimes.