Quote:
Originally posted by KillerYoda
I love arguments like this where the pro-war people always respond with the sarcastic "hmmm...well, I guess then..." while the anti-war people always post an article proving their point.
All in all, this thread should have really been named "If Fark already posted this article, so did a whole lot of other people."
|
hehe, yeah, but not everyone goes to Fark, and it's still interesting nonetheless
As for posting articles, there's not much of a need. What I and most others say isn't anything that is contrary to any articles one could post, but rather an inevitable conclusion through common sense (aka connecting the dots). I don't need an article to tell me that if a madman and chronic liar has a ton of weapons of mass destruction in 1998, kicks out inspectors, and when they return 4 years later claims he doesn't have them anymore but can't provide any proof of it - which he KNEW they would be looking for - that he's still lying and that they're really there in some form or another. Or maybe they're not - maybe he sold them to people already or something. But they sure weren't destroyed.