How would this be a point for creationists? Or does "one back" mean one point less for them? I'm not sure what you mean.
The Laetoli footprints date to 3.6 million years ago. These more modern footprints are 1.5 million years old. Since when is 2.1 million years NOT long enough for the foot to evolve, along the same lines as the full-body evolution shown in the hominin line?
I studied anthropology in college. I'm a huge proponent of Darwin and evolution. I love studying hominin and hominid fossils.
__________________
"Without passion man is a mere latent force and possibility, like the flint which awaits the shock of the iron before it can give forth its spark."
— Henri-Frédéric Amiel
|