Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
O'Reilly? Seriously?
O'Reilly's also on record accusing U.S. troops of committing the massacre at Malmédy, Belgium, during World War II, Uh, other way around there Billy boy.
He's also on record as stating his Boycott nearly ruined France. Last I heard they were doing fine. But you could always check his source the "Paris Business Review," Oh, wait... no you can't he made that publication up... just like most of his "facts."
I googled looking for stat's from the BOP I couldn't find any, they may be out there and this could be true. But the fact O'Reilly's on record with it makes me believe it's complete BS.
O'Reilly pulls more stats out of his ass then all the beans in Mexico. I know it's true, I read it in a study at Media Matters.
Well respected? By who, Lou Dobbs?
|
Well if you know its true why go into the rest? Let the No Spin Zones name be stricken Let the name of Oreilly be stricken from every book and tablet...
stricken from all pylons and obelisks, stricken from every monument of news gathering and journalism
Let the name of... Bill Oreilly
be unheard and unspoken,
erased from
the memory of men...
for all time. So let it be written- so let it done.
Yeah I did see that a couple of years ago. One of the truths about posting a quote is its open to scrutiny. In this case it is founded. The flip side of that practice is literally any sources for quotes can be. It's not difficult to dig to see who is pulling another's strings or what their possible agenda is. For example: you question who respects the information provided by CIS. One on what Im sure is a lengthy list is the US House of Representatives Committee on International Relations. Does that give them credabilty? Doesnt it depend on who you ask? How many tax payers dont respect the House of Reps? Is there any dirt one can find in that branch? Personally Im not an Oreilly fan, but how many millions of others are?
My point of including the video is how some people think they are addressing an issue but are actually sugar coating exactly what they are obviously trying not to openly state.
Maybe it would be worth it for you to initiate a thread to discuss parameters for quotes that all members find acceptable. It could save time eliminating the consuming task of verifying quote sources, their sources, who funded the website that its listed on, or the possibility that its a conspiracy being generated by the man behind the curtain.