Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Maybe. It depends on the context of the Castle Doctrine, considering it was the occupant who committed the homicide. Either way, the death penalty would be difficult to apply in this case because of the lack of intent.
|
while it was the occupant who fired the shot that killed assailant number one, assailant number two was a perpetrator of the crime and is legally responsible for a death during a felony crime. This could be charged capital murder.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|