Originally Posted by host
.....ace, considering the supporting`material in my last post....detailing the Clinton administration's co-operation with congressional committee requests for witness appearances, aren't reconmike and you doing the "ignoring"? Can you point to anything else on this thread that comes close to this?:
Was the substance of my last post, the above article, ignored because it was impossible to counter?
ace...(and reconmike....) I have posted the following in chronological order to make it easier for you to understand my presentation. Both of your recent posts reinforce my wondering whether it is time to divide the U.S. into two separate countries. My idea of a discussion, if one were actually to take place on this thread, and on this forum, and in this country, would be for ace, or reconmike, to post rebuttal opinions from attorneys or judges who support the white house, and Meier's decision to ignore subpoenas from congressional committees and to refuse to provide privilege logs, or...any specific support for claims of executive privilege. Citations of court decisions, even if not to the extent that democrats have provided, countering what democrats have provided, and that I have posted here, would be a refreshing turn away from the direction this thread has taken.
I extend to you the COURTESY....again and again....of sharing with you, the information (WITH LINKS !!!) that shaped my opinions and conclusions, and prompted me to post about them....
<b>Are you responding, in kind?</b>
ace....is Harriet Meiers, former appointee to the SCOTUS by Mr. Bush, setting an example of her fitness to serve as a justice on that bench, when she did not afford the congressional sub-committee, even the courtesy, of appearing before it, as demanded in the subpoena served to her by the sub-committee, after it was deemed necessary to subpoena here, because of her refusal to appear voluntarily, to either testify, or to assert claims of privilege, or of her fifth amendment rights?
ace, or reconmike....are you even keeping up a pretense, with the posting of a "Clinton's victim list (no links were provided), and with ace's Gore reference (above)....of participating in a political discussion, here? Isn't what you are doing, by posting the Gore reference, ace...in the context of this recent question, posted by
.....more appropriate for posting in a "general discussion", or in some other TFP forum?
|