I've been speaking the English language for as long as I can remember, and been writing for twice as long. I've even made up words on occasion, when I felt that there wasn't an entry in the lexicon that could convey my utter genius. I proofread Catcher in the Rye 20 times and made over 7 changes to the dedication page.
I can say with 143.7% certainty, that the author of the second article is an imposter! He must have hijacked the original author's internet persona and stolen his underwear, just to continue the story in a slightly different voice. This is all part of his diabolical plan to generate traffic to the same exact site from whence the original article came.
Nice try, mysterious techno-doppleganger, but we're on to you! Admit your crimes and repent!
__________________
I am the very model of a moderator gentleman.
|