Quote:
|
Originally Posted by samcol
I believe 9/11 was in inside job, but these particular vidoes are almost pointless in my opinion. It's absurd to claim that the TV videos of the plane attacks were fakery. There were plenty of videos from average citizens from dozens of angles recording the planes hitting the towers as well as eye witness reports. This pointless debate does nothing but give straw man arguments to non-believers in the 9/11 cover-up.
Concentrate on things like the drills on 9/11 or the 'pull it' comment from Silverstein and his massive insurance policy, or the dozens of other REAL incriminating evidence.
What you posted does nothing but hurt the credibility of the 9/11 truth movemnt.
|
I agree that the "pull it" statement by Silverstein is very incriminating, and so is the obvious controlled demolition of WTC 7. But wouldn't it be interesting if the whole WTC 7 thing was designed to distract the Truth Movement from other issues?
Let's take TV-Fakery for example. It implicates the corporate media directly as being the
actual orchestrators of the attacks. The corporate media are the ones who scared Americans into supporting a war in the Middle East, and into giving away their liberties.
Even
this article in Technology Review magazine, published one year before 9/11, explains that the military/media can insert prerecorded footage into live feed, and use it to alter world politics.
I'm not saying WTC 7 isn't important. But would it expose the
real perpetrators of 9/11? Those who know that 9/11 was an inside job also know that the 9/11 perps are masters at creating propaganda.