Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Then again, maybe there is actually something to the prosecution's case that the reporter neglected to mention. It wouldn't be the first time.
|
Whenever I read of cases like this I have to think that there is more to the story. Why in the world would anyone want to send a teacher to jail for unintentionally allowing porn popups to appear in class? Even if she did it intentionally the most she should get is fired. Apparently there is a law on the books making it illegal to corrupt the morals of a minor, but 40 years is ridiculous. The effort to protect children with these kinds of laws seems to go way overboard.
Perhaps the police, judge, jury and school administrators are really that stupid. Also why would the judge not allow her computer expert to offer his evidence. According to Herbert Horner he went to court prepared to demonstrate online how the popups occured but was denied when the prosecution objected because they were not given full disclosure beforehand.