The logic is that their is only a pre-supposition that an order exists to keep the exwife out of the home. The police did zero investigation or research to find out AND they knocked the first time they were there. That alone should show that they didn't believe there was a need for an armed response the second time. To believe that an armed and violent invasion is warranted in ANY POSSIBLE issue is to invite a judicially deleted 4th amendment.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|