View Single Post
Old 10-26-2006, 03:28 PM   #29 (permalink)
ubertuber
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Min
The rantings of a young male of my acquaintance upon the superiority of women. He and I both are curious of others' opinions.

Why Women Are Better Than Men: A Thesis


Women want one man to satisfy their every need. Men want every woman to satisfy their one need. World operates on propogation, so therefore, the only man not controlled by woman is they gay man. Though they cannot breed on, they're in a way superior, since they do not have that drive that affects their whole mind.

People of homosexual orientation have existed since people who were heterosexual existed.
As a rule, the view of sex from our human standpoint is based on our chemicals. At a base, estrogen and testosterone control our body shape and sexual drive. The testes produce 99% of testosterone in males, and the ovaries produce 99% of estrogen in females. Remove the testes, the man loses his desire to have sex, to carry on his gene. Remove the ovaries, the woman loses her desire to be a carrier for a child, and thus not follow on her gene. The pheromones then, are our sexual calling card. People who are compatible with our pheromones will flock to us, hence a grouping of a persons "type". If you remove the gonads, you remove the outputting of pheromones, and thus also cut off your ability to be a receptor to them. While, yes, you still may recieve the pheromones, you won't be able to respond to them. The proof behind a persons testes/ovaries controlling their drive can be shown by chemical castration, and how it destroys a persons sex drive utterly.

In the case of homosexuals, however, it seems their body has the right set of hormones until puberty, but at that time, the levels change drastically. Take in the stereotype of most lesbians being butch bull-dykes. They are such because they have more testosterone. Gay males are more effeminate since they have more testosterone. Manly gays do not exist, it is simply a foil for their womanlyness. Effeminate lesbians do not exist either, since they can only foil as such to get other females to talk to them. In this case, while their gonads are still their, their pheromone reception is off on some level, at a genetic base. Genetics determine orienation, quod est demonstradtum.

However, women have one-upped men again. Two men cannot produce offspring. Two women can. The purspose of the embryo is firstly a supply of the womens genes, and secondary is to provide a nourishment source before the egg embeds in a placenta. It also serves as a source of food until the baby is mature enough to have fully connected to the placenta by an umbilical cord. Two sperm have the genetic material to provide a viable child, but not the food source, so it has no actual ability to survive the hurdle of attatchment to the placenta itself. Two women, however, not only have the genetic information to provide a child(though it may only be female), but it has the nourishment to get that baby through the first stages. Through science being able to extract nucleii froms cells and transfer them to others, they have come up with this method of two females being able to reproduce. This may even get to the point where one woman can take two of her own eggs, and make a child on her own. Women > Men.

In ye olde times, such as the 1500-1600's of England, it's noticeable that women who were sought out were buxom, rounded, and qith quite hefty set hips. Why? Because one, that's fuckin' hot, two, the genetic inclination to bring a child to term properly, meant they were superior carriers than some hideous, skinny waif. It has come to the point where society has tried to change a persons views so hard, that it has succeeded. Yes, some few males(me) still believe a woman with curves is superior than a stick-thin bitch, but people have been so ingrained with that view that they now find that genetic aspect of their own wish to propogate disgusting, and give in to the majorital view.

I believe I speak for all well-knowing males when I say, If I wanted to date a woman who had the body of a ten year old boy, i'd just date a ten year old boy. Women, not only are you better than men, you are also better when you're bigger. I both hate you and love for that fact, so hooray for ambivolence.
Was this written as a joke to provoke responses? If so, it's moderately funny. If not...then it's not.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
ubertuber is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360