Seaver is right. Sophomoric, indeed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Min
Manly gays do not exist, it is simply a foil for their womanlyness. Effeminate lesbians do not exist either, since they can only foil as such to get other females to talk to them.
|
These are both extremely false. Extremely. Was this written by a person in high school, or perhaps someone who lives a sheltered (and therefore ignorant of the world) existence?
Quote:
Two men cannot produce offspring. Two women can.
...they have come up with this method of two females being able to reproduce. This may even get to the point where one woman can take two of her own eggs, and make a child on her own. Women > Men.
|
Fallacy of logic. Just because two women using a ton of extremely expensive medical equipment can engineer by process, a child, does not make it "two women can have a baby". This is also not to mention that it usually takes large cultures of multiple intercellular nucleus transplants to yield one "good" one, i.e., one transplant that will take and grow.
Also: without the sperm, you cannot make a male. Period. Until they can synthetically create chromosome 23 as a Y to replace the x the woman gives, they will always yield females. This is not an advantage.
And since they can't do it naturally, but require a massive intervention of medical technology, that can hardly count in the above rant. Two women can not make a baby. That's like saying I can make a car, because I have huge machinery that I can manipulate to manufacture one. Two women can see to the
manufacture of a baby.
Quote:
|
In ye olde times, such as the 1500-1600's of England, it's noticeable that women who were sought out were buxom, rounded, and qith quite hefty set hips. Why? Because one, that's fuckin' hot, two, the genetic inclination to bring a child to term properly, meant they were superior carriers than some hideous, skinny waif.
|
Actually, going further back than that, being fat/overweight/plump/whatever was a point of pride because it simply meant you were wealthy- you had more than enough food to eat. in the time period you reference, the reason that the fuller women were sought out is because they were believed to be healthier, since it appeared they ate well or even if they didn't, they still maintained what was considered a "healthy" weight. Skinny women were considered unhealthy because it was believed/accepted that they did not eat well, and were therefore would not be as nutritive an environment for a baby to grow in. Also, the skinny women usually had narrower hips- and they knew well enough back then that the wider the hips, the more successful the chance of live birth.
Quote:
|
I believe I speak for all well-knowing males when I say, If I wanted to date a woman who had the body of a ten year old boy, i'd just date a ten year old boy.
|
Except a female is a female and a male is a male, and being attracted to females is not solely based on body shape. If it were, I could find you plenty of big, fat men with breasts, whose size and shape rival your preferred female. Would that suffice? A big, curvy guy with boobs? Might want to rethink that comparison.
Also, being skinny or petite does not mean you have the body of a ten-year-old boy. They are often still quite curvy in their shape, and every bit as womanly as any other female.
So, in short, I disagree with almost everything.