Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Min · 10-25-2006, 05:23 PM

The rantings of a young male of my acquaintance upon the superiority of women. He and I both are curious of others' opinions.

Why Women Are Better Than Men: A Thesis

Women want one man to satisfy their every need. Men want every woman to satisfy their one need. World operates on propogation, so therefore, the only man not controlled by woman is they gay man. Though they cannot breed on, they're in a way superior, since they do not have that drive that affects their whole mind.

People of homosexual orientation have existed since people who were heterosexual existed.
As a rule, the view of sex from our human standpoint is based on our chemicals. At a base, estrogen and testosterone control our body shape and sexual drive. The testes produce 99% of testosterone in males, and the ovaries produce 99% of estrogen in females. Remove the testes, the man loses his desire to have sex, to carry on his gene. Remove the ovaries, the woman loses her desire to be a carrier for a child, and thus not follow on her gene. The pheromones then, are our sexual calling card. People who are compatible with our pheromones will flock to us, hence a grouping of a persons "type". If you remove the gonads, you remove the outputting of pheromones, and thus also cut off your ability to be a receptor to them. While, yes, you still may recieve the pheromones, you won't be able to respond to them. The proof behind a persons testes/ovaries controlling their drive can be shown by chemical castration, and how it destroys a persons sex drive utterly.

In the case of homosexuals, however, it seems their body has the right set of hormones until puberty, but at that time, the levels change drastically. Take in the stereotype of most lesbians being butch bull-dykes. They are such because they have more testosterone. Gay males are more effeminate since they have more testosterone. Manly gays do not exist, it is simply a foil for their womanlyness. Effeminate lesbians do not exist either, since they can only foil as such to get other females to talk to them. In this case, while their gonads are still their, their pheromone reception is off on some level, at a genetic base. Genetics determine orienation, quod est demonstradtum.

However, women have one-upped men again. Two men cannot produce offspring. Two women can. The purspose of the embryo is firstly a supply of the womens genes, and secondary is to provide a nourishment source before the egg embeds in a placenta. It also serves as a source of food until the baby is mature enough to have fully connected to the placenta by an umbilical cord. Two sperm have the genetic material to provide a viable child, but not the food source, so it has no actual ability to survive the hurdle of attatchment to the placenta itself. Two women, however, not only have the genetic information to provide a child(though it may only be female), but it has the nourishment to get that baby through the first stages. Through science being able to extract nucleii froms cells and transfer them to others, they have come up with this method of two females being able to reproduce. This may even get to the point where one woman can take two of her own eggs, and make a child on her own. Women > Men.

In ye olde times, such as the 1500-1600's of England, it's noticeable that women who were sought out were buxom, rounded, and qith quite hefty set hips. Why? Because one, that's fuckin' hot, two, the genetic inclination to bring a child to term properly, meant they were superior carriers than some hideous, skinny waif. It has come to the point where society has tried to change a persons views so hard, that it has succeeded. Yes, some few males(me) still believe a woman with curves is superior than a stick-thin bitch, but people have been so ingrained with that view that they now find that genetic aspect of their own wish to propogate disgusting, and give in to the majorital view.

I believe I speak for all well-knowing males when I say, If I wanted to date a woman who had the body of a ten year old boy, i'd just date a ten year old boy. Women, not only are you better than men, you are also better when you're bigger. I both hate you and love for that fact, so hooray for ambivolence.

10-25-2006, 05:23 PM	#1 (permalink)
Min Crazy Location: Louisiana	Why Women Are Better Than Men: A Thesis The rantings of a young male of my acquaintance upon the superiority of women. He and I both are curious of others' opinions. Why Women Are Better Than Men: A Thesis Women want one man to satisfy their every need. Men want every woman to satisfy their one need. World operates on propogation, so therefore, the only man not controlled by woman is they gay man. Though they cannot breed on, they're in a way superior, since they do not have that drive that affects their whole mind. People of homosexual orientation have existed since people who were heterosexual existed. As a rule, the view of sex from our human standpoint is based on our chemicals. At a base, estrogen and testosterone control our body shape and sexual drive. The testes produce 99% of testosterone in males, and the ovaries produce 99% of estrogen in females. Remove the testes, the man loses his desire to have sex, to carry on his gene. Remove the ovaries, the woman loses her desire to be a carrier for a child, and thus not follow on her gene. The pheromones then, are our sexual calling card. People who are compatible with our pheromones will flock to us, hence a grouping of a persons "type". If you remove the gonads, you remove the outputting of pheromones, and thus also cut off your ability to be a receptor to them. While, yes, you still may recieve the pheromones, you won't be able to respond to them. The proof behind a persons testes/ovaries controlling their drive can be shown by chemical castration, and how it destroys a persons sex drive utterly. In the case of homosexuals, however, it seems their body has the right set of hormones until puberty, but at that time, the levels change drastically. Take in the stereotype of most lesbians being butch bull-dykes. They are such because they have more testosterone. Gay males are more effeminate since they have more testosterone. Manly gays do not exist, it is simply a foil for their womanlyness. Effeminate lesbians do not exist either, since they can only foil as such to get other females to talk to them. In this case, while their gonads are still their, their pheromone reception is off on some level, at a genetic base. Genetics determine orienation, quod est demonstradtum. However, women have one-upped men again. Two men cannot produce offspring. Two women can. The purspose of the embryo is firstly a supply of the womens genes, and secondary is to provide a nourishment source before the egg embeds in a placenta. It also serves as a source of food until the baby is mature enough to have fully connected to the placenta by an umbilical cord. Two sperm have the genetic material to provide a viable child, but not the food source, so it has no actual ability to survive the hurdle of attatchment to the placenta itself. Two women, however, not only have the genetic information to provide a child(though it may only be female), but it has the nourishment to get that baby through the first stages. Through science being able to extract nucleii froms cells and transfer them to others, they have come up with this method of two females being able to reproduce. This may even get to the point where one woman can take two of her own eggs, and make a child on her own. Women > Men. In ye olde times, such as the 1500-1600's of England, it's noticeable that women who were sought out were buxom, rounded, and qith quite hefty set hips. Why? Because one, that's fuckin' hot, two, the genetic inclination to bring a child to term properly, meant they were superior carriers than some hideous, skinny waif. It has come to the point where society has tried to change a persons views so hard, that it has succeeded. Yes, some few males(me) still believe a woman with curves is superior than a stick-thin bitch, but people have been so ingrained with that view that they now find that genetic aspect of their own wish to propogate disgusting, and give in to the majorital view. I believe I speak for all well-knowing males when I say, If I wanted to date a woman who had the body of a ten year old boy, i'd just date a ten year old boy. Women, not only are you better than men, you are also better when you're bigger. I both hate you and love for that fact, so hooray for ambivolence.