|
After reading, I'm left mostly with questions.
What incentive is there for environmental conservation? Who benefits other than our health and the environment? On the other hand, to ignore oppotunities for conservation brings great financial incentives to polluting business - at least until we all smarten up and buy only green - which we haven't yet.
There is no "smoking gun" to support global warming, just a clear correlation between human pollution and climate change. The non-scientific approach, as demonstrated above, would be to dismiss the changes and continue our undeniably unsustainable ways (and there are only so many trees in the forest, and clean air in the cities, and space in the landfills). The right thing to do is to continue investigating and until then, act prudently.
There are proven benefits to conservation (I can't believe I have to say that...I'm probably going to have to prove it, aren't I?) other than preventing climate change.
j8ear: you should be proud of your brilliant trap
__________________
!check out my new blog! http://arkanamusic.wordpress.com
Warden Gentiles: "It? Perfectly innocent. But I can see how, if our roles were reversed, I might have you beaten with a pillowcase full of batteries."
|