Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
So you've come down off your high horse and started to ask if we agree to something potentially plausible and actually legal? You started off this thread with a death threat.
|
I did NOT start this off with a death threat. I simply said he should be tried and executed, via due process, which is in NO WAY a death threat. Please do not attribute statements to me that were never made.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Some might suggest the same arguments apply for the impeachment of Bush, but I would hope it would be limited to impeachment, and not execution (sorry, I couldnt resist  )
Impeachment is a SERIOUS Constitutional remedy and should never be politicized.
There is an excellent interview with former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor worth reading on the threat to an indpendent juidiciary: |
I've read it and she's right. One has to consider, how many cases must one have overturned before you consider to remove a justice from the bench?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
Last edited by dksuddeth; 09-19-2006 at 12:05 PM..
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|