View Single Post
Old 09-18-2006, 07:35 PM   #580 (permalink)
Dilbert1234567
Devils Cabana Boy
 
Dilbert1234567's Avatar
 
Location: Central Coast CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
As I understood your point, you were assuming a temperature close to 1500C (2732F). That's simply not the case.
Eh? No, please don’t take my out of context, it makes me mad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
I would agree that it was closer to 1500C, but I use 500C as a low bound I’m sure it was hotter then that, and 500C is all the heat I need on the beam to show a good cause of the failure of the building.
First this quote was when you said it was 1500C, and I agreed, then I recognized I meant F
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
It’s hard to agree on a temperature, in any investigation, it needs to be a range of possibilities, at least 500C, but no more than 1500C
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
correct, but I don’t think the beam reached 1500C, from what I’ve read it was about half as hot as that.
If you nit pick my statements, you can make me say anything, context is what is important

Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Wouldn't the load of the crashing debris be decreased by the fact that it was demolishing and breaking into smaller pieces as it came down? Do you think that we can actually work out some rough math to compare weight with resistence?
Resistance would be impossible to work out; however, the amount of force compared to the resistance is like a bowling ball and a wet paper towel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel


WTC: The collapses started at the upper middle and top, with no structural strength loss at the lower middle or bottom of the building
-the strongest supports would still have been intact when the building collapsed, which would offer resistence
Yes, but as previously said, the amount of resistance is mute, it’s too small to stop the upper floors from crashing down and destroying the rest of the building.

I have a physics midterm to study for; I think this is my last post for the day.


Quick note to cynthetiq, the speed of collapse was just slightly longer than a freefall.

I’ll crunch some numbers to find the experimentally derived resistance the tower experienced to fall in the time it did.
__________________
Donate Blood!

"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
Dilbert1234567 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360