|
I see your point, and in ways agree with it, as it is obvious that should someone decide to use a Gun to commit a crime they would prefer to do so unopposed. My point is simply that while this may be the case, it is not a reason to make guns unrestricted on private property. I well understand the vehement position of a "Right to Bear Arms", and have no problem with Gun owners, or the Laws in effect to limit proliferation of Some weapons. My point is that Gun free zones do not "Make" it more likely there will be violence, which is the implication you make....intended or not.
It just seems to me that if you want me to agree with this right to carry a firearm, you should allow me to say...."Not in here"....if I do not want one in my House/Buisiness/School/ Whatever. It is when you push to hard, that people begin to push back, even if there is agreement on the issue in the first place.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
|