Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zz0011
Question: Does that mean that all the previous abductions and savage beheadings of innocent westerners, including journalists, "prove Muslims are NOT indulgent?"
Or has that already been proven? With Awad simply having a convenient political memory?
Or WHEN Carroll is murdered -- as I believe she will be -- will we finally be able to shed the PC cover for terrorists in the media and soundly and roundly renounce them, and fully support ALL efforts to fight and defeat them?
I WOULD LOVE TO BE WRONG ABOUT WHAT I EXPECT WILL HAPPEN TO JILL CARROLL.
I'm sure even if she is murdered the terrorists will still have their apologists on many sides.
Sad, sad, sad...
|
I am glad I was wrong IN THIS CASE.
I am glad for Jill and her family.
But the truth is most of these types of cases end in beheadings and death.
Why won't the US media show that?
Too busy with pictures of naked prisoners with underwear on their head and a leash on their necks?
No, I'm not condoning that -- but the media seems idiotic at best and duplicitous at worse for not proclaiming truth.
When the fellow in VA {?} ran over a bunch of students on a campus, and said he did it to avenge the deaths of Muslims, where was the hue and cry in mainstream media about the hate crimes, etc.?
Yes, I can still hear the echoes of the crickets...
Again, I am very happy to be wrong and that Jill is safe.
It would be great to think the Muslims would do this in every case, but history argues very strongly against that.