Justsomeguy

Just commenting that I enjoy these articles. First, there are always many fallacies of logic. Second, many ideas that the authors argue against are ideas that they want to believe the opposing group believes. However, most of the time the opposing groups do not carry those believes. Furthermore, they take a simple concept and take the extreme oppositions. For example, if someone says that they are not in support of war, you cannot say they are in support of doing nothing. In many instances people that oppose a war would feel strongly that other measures are necessary. However, arguments such as the link quoted above ignore that concept.

Finally, atheist arguments are really interesting because they normally take a radical belief that is identical to the fundamentalists who they loathe so severely. For example, "I believe there is a god just because I think there should be one." "Haha, you're an idiot to believe in a god because I don't think there is one," in which both are normally followed by some primitive supporting statement that a two year old is capable of presenting.