I propose a change in direction for this thread, as a way to frame it for debate:
If indeed there is truth to this theory and Iraq did move chemical weapons out of country, taking into account the move away from WMD's as justification for the war in the first place by the Administration, would this even be relevant anymore. Or do you think the Administration would re-emphasize this issue as reasoning for the invasion, in an attempt to regain support from the American People.
__________________
Holding onto anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned. - Buddha
|