Quote:
80 years? Perhaps not. How about 4 billion? I'm sorry, but you really don't have any idea what you're talking about. What the (laughable) videos do is show up that their creator has as little imagination and failure to comprehend the facts of life as you have.
I'm not 'relying' on the idea that tons of mutations can result in new adaptive traits - I've explained to you how it works, and how not only will it result in new adaptive traits, but how it will have very likely been responsible for all life on earth. And you've just ignored what I said. You certainly have not thought about, or analyzed it. If you are so open minded, then how come you haven't spotted that the videos don't counter these specific arguments, they simply avoid them.
|
That’s very difficult to know. It needs an advanced math formula to prove it that 4 billion years can do it. We cannot see a computer made by nature. Nature cannot create a computer, or a memory or any chip. So how can it create creatures which are thousands of times more complex? Nature cannot create nor evolution. Evolution can advance species with already existing genetic information. I hope you can watch the video “collapse of Darwinism” which contains both points of view to be fully objective. It shows how many scientific discoveries turned out to be forgeries like the pilt down man.
Quote:
|
As a human being, with experience of the world, you ought to be able to see the flaw in the premise (i.e. the world is not perfect, humans are not perfect, nature is not perfect)
|
Yes, this not a perfect world. However God created creatures perfectly suited to their environment and life. Nature is so balanced. The ozone layer, the volcano that makes O3 ozone, the biological cycle and resources of earth being fully balanced, all these and more are what God gave humans. It is not the job of God to make everything perfect for humans. But thanks for mentioning this subject because I mentioned in a thread why not everything is perfect and what is the purpose of life:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...4&page=2&pp=40
So we could have come from viruses but that is a small percentage. It’s a hypothesis by one man, not a worldwide theory yet. Have you heard of the pilt down man scandal? Or the Fraud of Haeckel's Embryos?
Haueckel was a darwinist who made a graph to show that all embryos of different types of animals and humans came from one source. Then it turned out to be fake. The Haeckel modified the drawings of the emberyos to make it look like humans and animals are the same in the beginning and to support the theory that evolution is what changed animal to man.
The pilt down man scandal: Around 1913, an English scientist came up with a skeleton of an ape head size was big. This was a great pride for the British as they believed that the man came from the ape and that the English ape man had bigger brain. They concluded that the English man was smarter and the person who discovered it was given a knight honor by the queen. 40 years later, it turned out to be a scandal. Keneth Oakly, after a lot of inspection, discovered in 1953 that the so called pilt down man was in fact a human skull attached to an arongotan jaw (type of gorrilla or ape).
This can all be found in the video, "collapse of Darwinism" in Harun Yahya videos. So can we just beleive now that man came from viruses because a scientist said so? Too hard to beleive. No evidence of evolution has been made. No trans human species has been found. There is an insect which i don't know its name, that has a long body, and lived millions of years ago and is still living now. It has the same complexity. Evolution has not changed its complexity or added a new part to it.
Quote:
It's bloody rude of you to post this under the heading "scientific videos".
I have a bunch of science books (and videos), and I wouldn't try to pass them off as religion. Are you truly blind to the accepted differences between religion philosophy and science - or do you simply not care about pissing people off?
|
Nimetic, all this abundant of free information given to you and all you say is it’s rude? All 58 videos about data, sightings from the book, predictions 1400 years ago, histories of nations and scientific deductions, and free information given…
Science, the Quran is not a book of science; it is the book of God. But it has scientific information only discovered with the 20th century technology. The videos use the method of deduction. Deduction is a method in science.
When he shows you what happened for example to the perished nations, and then the archeologists find traces of what happens, and he shows you it is written in the Quran, and he tells you about the messengers that came to those perished nations, and what happened to them exactly as described. It’s a deduction method that leads to the answer that God is who made all that. Deduction is a scientific method so don’t worry, there’s science.
I also care about other people. That’s why I came here. Why would I give all this info and evidence and videos when I can simply spend the time on my own work? Why should I care? I do care about the fact that I have knowledge that I have to share.
In the video, “full collapse of Darwinism”, you can see an interviewer interviewing well known professor Richard Dawkins, an important pro Darwinist. He asked him to give an example of new organs that came to an animal via evolution. The professor just sat still and could not answer.