Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I had a similar scale, but in reverse. It was the Clydesdale Scale. It measured how many Clydesdales it would take to drag me away. To give you a sense of the scale, we determined that Catherine Zeta Jones would be about a .25 on the Clydesdale Scale. Hey, a Clydesdale is a big animal! The scale does go into the negatives. A negative number quantifies how hard you're whipping the Clydesdale.
I also devised the millihelen. The millihelen is a unit of measurement of female beauty. One millihelen is the amount of beauty necessary to launch one ship.
/threadjack: I now return you to your regularly scheduled MILFing.
|
Whereas the guys I used to go barhopping with had the beerometer. Roughly, it was the number of beers it would take for the individual to go home with somebody in the room - sort of a clydesdale average of all the women present. A beerometer reading cannot be negative but can be zero, although for it to be a zero it would pretty much have to be the Swedish Bikini Team in the room or something. The beerometer would also rise or fall over the course of the night as different girls entered and left the room. Thus, when an unattractive girl came into the room someone would say 'beerometer rising!', or for a very attractive girl you might say 'the beerometer just dropped a few pints.'
Yeah, we were a bunch of assholes.