Quote:
Originally Posted by Manx
Of course it means something.
What you essentially did was this:
A lot of liberals think conservatives are stupid, but really they just can't accept that conservatives think differently. Therefore, no matter what I say (for example, err on the side of life), it is applicable and well thought through.
But since no one claimed that any statement (for example, err on the side of life) is due to the stupidity of conservatives, what you tried to do was simply to mask on empty statement behind yet another empty statement.
Instead of describing HOW the err on the side of life statement is AT ALL applicable to the Schiavo case, you simply reiterated that it is and then tried to change the subject.
|
First, I didn't think this thread was about the shaivo case.
Second, I've probably said "err on the side of life" once, possibly twice, always at the end of a statement specifying why I feel that way. Don't act like I posted a one-liner by itself.
You read that one-line and it doesn't matter what else was said because I'm using a "generic one-line phrase." Even if those are my own words, from my own brain, and I didn't hear them first on the radio or read them in my daily breefing from mr. rove.