Quote:
My point is that Lenin and Marx used the same rhetoric to advance their agenda. And look what happened. 100 million people were killed.
|
that is idiotic.
most of marx's work starts from the problem of alienation--which is a central feature in capitalist modes of production. the political dimension derives from trying to imagine what the overcoming of alienation would look like. and he never really spelled out what exactly he envisioned. but it is clear if you actually read marx that it follows that socialism for him would probably look more like a direct democracy than anything you have in mind.
there is a second dimension to marx's work that is much more problematic--that capitalism unfolded across objective contradictions--from which followed lenin's later claim that the revolutionary vanguard knew better than anyone else what these were and what actions they required at any given time. there is alot more that could be said here, but i'll leave it for now.
the question of organization is noted in marx but somewhat underdeveloped. engels was more interested in it, in part as a function of his understanding of revolution as a variant of civil war. which entailed a military-type organization. top-down command structures. lenin simply extended this basic view into a strategy that worked in the context of russia 1917.
lenin's work was mostly concerned with tactical matters--apart from state and revolution and a few other texts--the conflict between leninist type organization and anything like a direct democratic type of system was made perfectly clear with the suppression of the krorstadt rebellion and the gutting of any meaningful content of the notion of the soviets. those who are more sympathetic to lenin aften argue that this represents a kind of turn in his position forced onto him by the civil war. i do not buy that--i think centralized, military-style hierarchies are built into the very center of lenin's organizational theory.
there are many many other problems with your take on these people.
the short version of them is that you simply do not know what you are talking about, ncb.
it would be better for you to change tack.