|
I don't understand the backlash this thread has received. The first post seems very well connected to the thread title.
Host questions how Bush could question anyone on the tenets of democracy. To support this opinion that Bush is to democracy as oil is to water, Host posted links to a few articles. The first article is simply a statement of the uniquness of Russia and the U.S. discussing each others respective forms of democracy. The second article discusses the U.S. action of outsourcing torture, surely anti-democractic. The third article discusses inefficiencies in the election process in the U.S. (is the election process not the cornerstone of democracy? when any other nation has issues with their elections, are they not questioned on their ability to maintain democracy?). And the fourth article is similar to the second.
So why are most of the responses to this thread along the lines of "you have no point".
Yes he does, and he initiated it quite well.
|