Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

ObieX · 02-10-2005, 12:34 PM

I was under the impression that after fox ran it once the NFL said not to play it again.

The second ad was supposed to play at the 2 minute warning, so their commercial would have been fresh in people's minds after the game. And since it was such a close game people would have been watching. This info came from the godaddy.com guy (he called in to howard stern this morning).

Fox also edited out the phrase "wardrobe malfuction" fromt he commercial. Apparently it was going to be in a "censored" block over the chest of the woman, but either Fox or the NFL or both said it would cause trouble so they edited it out.

If i were the guy i would be super pissed. The spot costs like $2.5MILLION and was in a super-good time during the game. This whole deal about censorship on the airwaves has gotten way out of control.

02-10-2005, 12:34 PM	#3 (permalink)
ObieX Pickles Location: Shirt and Pants (NJ)	I was under the impression that after fox ran it once the NFL said not to play it again. The second ad was supposed to play at the 2 minute warning, so their commercial would have been fresh in people's minds after the game. And since it was such a close game people would have been watching. This info came from the godaddy.com guy (he called in to howard stern this morning). Fox also edited out the phrase "wardrobe malfuction" fromt he commercial. Apparently it was going to be in a "censored" block over the chest of the woman, but either Fox or the NFL or both said it would cause trouble so they edited it out. If i were the guy i would be super pissed. The spot costs like $2.5MILLION and was in a super-good time during the game. This whole deal about censorship on the airwaves has gotten way out of control. __________________ We Must Dissent.