Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mephisto
What's your point?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sob
My point was that your statement was inaccurate. I just tried to word it more politely than this:
|
How could an opinion be inaccurate? I have mine, you have yours.
And, and with reference to my statement "Even by your standards sob", I wasn't trying to be impolite. I was stating that I don't believe that most or all (or just "a lot") of the decapitations are the actions of Al Queda. Personally I think that Al Queda is credited with a lot more than it already carries out. I believe it has inspired a lot of groups, but I think as an effective force it was probably destroyed in Afghanistan and by subsequent arrests and targetted assassinations by the US and its allies. Of course, once again, that's just my opinion.
You continue to search for reasons to take offence at my posts. You've even ignored personal messages I've sent clarifying your misunderstanding of certain things I've posted and compliments I've made.
I can't really do anything if you
want to be insulted.
Quote:
Ooooh, that was good. You switched from "al Qaeda" to "attacks." Your statement was that Iraq was "a country that had no involvement with Al Queda." Even though that long post of mine was titled, "Clear link between Iraq and al-Qaeda."
Unless you believe that every al Qaeda cell was involved in the attacks, your statement is irrelevant to what I said.
|
SIGH
You're splitting hairs. If you want to dissect every sentence, word for word, then there's likely to be no value in further discussion.
I don't really want to play games. I come here for engaging, educational and enjoyable repartee with fellow board-members. Despite my attempts, my interaction with you has proven to be none of the above.
I wish you well and will try, in any subsequent discussion, to be more exacting, should I choose to comment on your posts.
Mr Mephisto