Quote:
Originally Posted by Stompy
Am I the only one sick of mindless responses like this? I don't know what's going through your mind, but chances are, your posts beyond this won't improve much.
|
Good lord. The posting I quoted included none of the disclaimers your now offering (and on further reflection had offered previously), and your only defense is name calling and child like whining.
You've got me on the ropes now
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89931/899312f0c94c200dd9538bf916392300407f6212" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
!
I'll refrain from challenging your positions further. You're seemingly unable to handle sarcasm or opposition without a tantrum.
-bear
FWIW, I am on your side with the victimless crime angle, but disagree that the population/legislator doesn't have a right to enact victimless crime legislation. Capable and permitted doesn't necc ensure reasonable (gay marriage ban). Similarly reasonable doesn't necc mean capable or permitted (gun control).
Edited as I am guilty of being a pot calling a kettle black