View Single Post
Old 09-14-2004, 04:49 PM   #21 (permalink)
Lasereth
Knight of the Old Republic
 
Lasereth's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by catback
I will say G4Techtv is the worst thing to happen to Techtv and G4 is probably the worst thing to happen to man-kind. As far as all this ram, proc, video card crap, why are you doubting a man who's taken computer science (aka kevin). Sure he dropped out but that doesn't mean he didn't take the classes. I myself have a degree in that field and with regard to most gamers in the middle-computing power, middle-cost class an upgrade in processor is usually better than in video card. Why you ask, because doom 3 is a processor and video card intensive game. The minimum requirements of 1.5Ghz processor tell you this right on the box. Sure you need a good video card too but even if you spend $500 on the latest greatest card it can't perform without a processor and bus capable of feeding it. If you have near 3ghz processor then upgrade in video card will do wonders but if you have around a 1.5 ghz processor and buy an expensive ass video card your not going to see the performance you paid for and would have gotten better performance for cheaper with a processor upgrade.
Most CS degrees don't teach you about extremely detailed hardware information. I DO know this information because I read very intricate, in-depth reviews and analyses on the Internet from trustworthy sources every single day. It's a fact that the videocard handles most of the computations within games nowadays. If you're faced with upgrading to a midrange videocard or a midrange processor, it's still best to go with the videocard. The days of a processor upgrade being better than a videocard upgrade are over. If you have a crappy videocard and a crappy processor, it's better to upgrade all of it, but if you have to choose, a videocard will benefit you three times over than a new processor.

Doom 3 can barely be called a processor intensive game. If a $50 processor and a $400 videocard will run Doom 3 VERY well, then the videocard is obviously the main factor. Like I said before, there's a small increase in performance within Doom 3 even from a huge processor upgrade. There is a MASSIVE increase in performance from upgrading to a better videocard. The game is RAM (amount, not speed) and videocard intensive...barely processor intensive (even though you need a somewhat decent processor to play it).

Quote:
Originally Posted by catback
if you have around a 1.5 ghz processor and buy an expensive ass video card your not going to see the performance you paid for and would have gotten better performance for cheaper with a processor upgrade.
I hate to be an ass, but that's not right. You'll see a much larger performance boost with a 1.5 GHz processor and a top of the line videocard than with a better processor and not top of the line videocard. Like I said before, gaming performance with, say, a GeForce 6800 Ultra and a $50 Athlon XP 2000+ will totally outperform a 3 GHz Pentium 4 with a GeForce 4. There's no getting around the tests!

-Lasereth
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
Lasereth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46