I guess I dont know a lot about it - I would have thought that all weapons worth having are at least capable of "assault" otherwise what would be the point of them? If the ban is only based on what a gun looks like and other legal weapons have the same capabilities, then either the legal weapons like this should be banned too, or they all should be legal.
I dont really understand the concept of partial gun control anyway. I could accept there are qualitative differences to a degree - like I could understand banning a rocket laucher but not a pistol... but if - for example - you ban the AK47, but the M16 machine gun is still legal, what is the point? What does it achieve? Someone can be killed just as easily with the M 16.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."
The Gospel of Thomas
|