It was a 3 part response to your initial post "Ad Hom, the lazy debaters tool for success", listed in order of relevance / intent:
Part A: What comes around goes around.
Part B: Being that there was no debate initiated, unlike "good things happening in Iraq", where the poster had at least two paragraphs on why he posted/what he thought, i couldn't possibly have employed any sort of successfull debate tactic for lazy people.
Part C: This part was unrelated to the thread so it wasn't expounded on, and initiated by the the recognition of the previous comment that you are almost certainly a college student, and almost certainly liberal (right?) reminded me of my days in college when liberalism was shoved down my throat, and the irony that you guys get so upset with AM radio and Fox news.
And in case you were wondering that light-hearted little jab came in, I tried to tie it all together with my last sentence "Was there anything to debate? Talk about lazy....", letting you know precisely where that came from.
In a nutshell, it was essentially a T answer binding together each of the DA links ( i thought you would be impressed, thereby making up for my previous post)
Last edited by matthew330; 05-27-2004 at 02:38 PM..
|