05-27-2004, 05:13 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Muffled
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nanofever
Bah, that's just unwillingness to adapt to a newer aspect of the game. Spread all you want, off-case will be link-turned into advantages and on-case should be prepped with blocks to answer any viable arguments.
Then again, I pulled dirty, dirty tricks as a debater. Think Irony cases that skirt topicality with a 30 point T = no voter block, with a critique of T saying T is a form of oppression and a few hiddin RVI's and IVI's in that block. Using T answers to bind people to DA links was also a favorite evil play of mine.
/would like an aisle seat to cx debater hell
|
NEEEEERRRRDDD!!! 
__________________
it's quiet in here
|
|
|