1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

Why attack Sikhs?

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by genuinemommy, Aug 5, 2012.

  1. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    It looks like we're running the risk of losing focus here. Are you suggesting that liberal America has the same problems with racism generally and Muslims specifically as conservatives? With xenophobia? With the Other?

    Why bring this up?

    Are there liberal racists? Against Muslims? Probably. But is it a systemic problem such as that among the right wing? Probably not.

    Your question seems like a barbed question, because that's not what roachboy is implying. You were criticizing him for generalizations, but now you're being presumptive.

    I don't think it makes sense to talk about anarchist tendencies or ecoterrorism or anti-capitalism in a thread on this topic. Do you?

    Are all conservatives racists? No, that's not what's being argued. Do conservatives have an exclusive on hatred? Of course not. That's not what is being argued.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2012
  2. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Not an exclusive, but the preponderance of hate crimes are fueled by racism, anti-gay, anti-semitic, Islamaphobia, anti-abortion....sentiments of the right.
     
  3. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    Really? The militia set went out and bought all those guns? ALL those militia sets? Seems obtuse instead of obvious. I mean, really, sounds more of the fear and consternation tactics for your own beliefs that you're blaming the conservatives for. So everyone else is paranoid and fed conspiracy theory but you are devoid and incapable of it.

    rise in gun sales tend to follow trends like anything where people believe that their rights or ability to purchase will be severely curtailed. This same thing happened in California before the ban on assault rifles, thank goodness at the time I had gotten mine before the law went into effect.
    --- merged: Aug 7, 2012 at 11:08 AM ---
    No, I'm pointing out that he is painting a broad stroke on ALL conservatives, that's how I understood his last posts I've responded to.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 14, 2012
  4. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Does the rise in gun sales explain the growing post-9/11 Islamophobia?

    Or is it just that there is a black president who has been demagogued by the NRA as having a secret plot to destroy the Second Amendment.
     
  5. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    He did clarify, making the distinction that he's referring to the impact of neofascism as an outcome of right-wing hegemony (at the expense, in my own view, of moderates, centrists, and liberalism). He's not referring to conservatives as a group of individuals; he's referring to the conservatism as it operates politically in the U.S. There is a difference. Remember, roachboy has admitted to having conservative acquaintances, and even having shared beverages with them (gasp!). I don't think he'd hang out with neofascists. I doubt he'd make such a simplistic argument as conservative = neofascist.

    Of course, I don't want to put words in his mouth (or, as it happens, in his TFP box). But that's how I see it.
     
  6. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    Oh I see. I can't just want to protect myself from nutjobs like the one in Aurora, VA, and Norway. Strange how binary it is for you.
    --- merged: Aug 7, 2012 at 11:21 AM ---
    note at the expense... that's the broad brush.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 14, 2012
  7. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    I am just trying to understand how "people believe that their rights or ability to purchase will be severely curtailed" has any connection to the rise of violence and hate crimes by right wing groups or persons against Muslims, gays, abortion providers..and now Sikhs.

     
  8. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    I don't know, maybe because laws tend to be passed in response to most recent violence. Laws and changes happen usually AFTER someone dies, not before.

    I'm trying to understand why someone wants to remove rights from people as a reaction to situations.
     
  9. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Perhaps because even having a discussion about gun violence before (and after) a violent event is mischaracterized as an attempt to remove rights from law-abiding citizens.
     
  10. Plan9

    Plan9 Rock 'n Roll

    Location:
    Earth
    Because the powers that be want to throw another 1934/1986/1994 piece of legislation down on lawful citizens in response to these horrible acts.

    It's kneejerk "Look, we're doing something!" that only serves to piss off legit gun owners and does absolutely nothing to stop "domestic terrorists."

    The Clinton-era Assault Weapon Ban of 1994, for example, sure did a lot to curtail crime. No bayonet lugs, no scary pistol grip furniture, etc.

    It's like saying that auto fatalities are up so we're going to ban cup holders and CD players because maybe these things contribute to them.

    The language of fear and demonization of a particular type of inanimate object over another. Google "Evil Black Rifle" sometime for laughs.
     
  11. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    So when I criticize actions of the U.S. or the actions of corporations, you see that as a problem too? Does that also offend you? You are, after all, an American. You may also work for a corporation, for all I know.
     
  12. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Frankly, I am more concerned about the language of fear and demonization of Muslims, abortion providers, gays, Mexican immigrants ..and the resulting violence perpetrated against them and the fact that we cant even look at a broad range of legislative/policy solutions, including gun laws, w/o the NRA demonizing the process as an attempt to destroy the Second Amendment.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2012
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Plan9

    Plan9 Rock 'n Roll

    Location:
    Earth
    Just in case it wasn't obvious: I am, too.

    How do you fix that with firearm legislation?
     
  14. mixedmedia

    mixedmedia ...

    Location:
    Florida
    I can't think of any inanimate object that I am so attached to that it makes it impossible to talk with reasonable people about the consequences of its prevalence and possible detriments to the society I live in. Or even compromise. I think this is true for many people and is responsible for the bewilderment that many of us feel when we see the heights of passion that some gun owners go to in order to defend their, um, hobby.
     
  15. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    You look at a comprehensive approach, including firearm legislation, with a goal of achieving a balance of protecting individual rights and public health/safety. One example I gave before, looking at both the Brady law "mental capacity" restrictions and the HIPAA health privacy restrictions.
     
  16. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

  17. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2012
  18. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    right, we tried having a discussion making Delancey Street safer, this is where the Williamsburg Bridge enters Manhattan. For years people have been saying that it is unsafe to cross there because there is a high rate of speed that cars traverse that road. You know when they finally did something? About 6 months ago. Why? Because a 6 year old died.

    After that 6 year old died they got that shit into gear because what a tragedy! A child died, never mine the adults that died at the same intersection. Think of the children!

    Knee jerk reactions to creating laws. That's how it's been. It isn't a proactive response, it never is. Please point out laws that are made BEFORE there is an issue. Did they make laws to protect people's money from predatory lending before the lending was predatory?
     
  19. redux

    redux Very Tilted

    Location:
    Foggy Bottom
    I gave one example of a proactive program. COPS, a successful 20-year old program that provides federal funding to support more local police, local programs targeted to high crime communities, and more support for prosecutors that received decreased funding every year (if i recall) under the previous Republican administration and the current gun rights crowd in the Congress. (btw, Obama's stimulus bill included $1 bill for COPS).

    Republicans talk "all we need is more enforcement" but one could ask how to accomplish that w/o adequate funding?
     
  20. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    Really? You mean to say the put COPS out there BEFORE there was crimes? No it was in RESPONSE to the crimes that were being committed.

    Right you don't get assign more cops to where there are no crimes.

    Notice, support more local police, local programs targeted to high crime communities.