1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. We've had very few donations over the year. I'm going to be short soon as some personal things are keeping me from putting up the money. If you have something small to contribute it's greatly appreciated. Please put your screen name as well so that I can give you credit. Click here: Donations
    Dismiss Notice

N. Korea approves nuclear strike on United States: How do you feel about that?

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by cynthetiq, Apr 3, 2013.

  1. roachboy

    roachboy Very Tilted

    this is an interestingly timed piece of theater...it enabled the deployment of otherwise quite useless star-wars period technologies to guam, and the legitimation of that boondoggle courtesy of reagan-period military keynesian policy. for example.

    a little war hysteria is good for business.
     
  2. I'd be very surprised if SK would do anything without our approval. And I'll bet they've been told that, too. Nothing happens unless we (the US) approves it. But yes, if SK did punch back, we'd end up in it very deep.
     
  3. ralphie250

    ralphie250 Fully Erect

    Location:
    At work..
    Somebody just needs to kick him in the balls...
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    In all truth, I have two parts of me.

    One part says, do it and you're all glass.
    The 2nd part is my compassionate/political side...and it's much more considerate and complex.

    But frankly, I think if they are stupid enough to instigate something...then it will likely end in a scenario of what we had in Germany/Berlin at the end of WWII.
    I doubt that the US would actually use nukes...too much political impact, especially with China nearby.
    But likely it would be the US/SK diving in full hilt with contemporary military, like Kuwait...with China reacting and meeting the other way.
    NK as we know it would be gone, with China and the US splitting the difference.
    Not to keep, but maintain like Germany/Berlin...and over time what was left of NK would be propped up by the Big Countries, then worked out and integrated with SK for a full Korea.

    The only real question would be how many nukes NK would get off before it would finish, if at all in reality...and where would they launch.
    But if they did anything initially...the world couldn't let it stand. Too much of a precedent to not respond to...for any country.
     
  5. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    • Like Like x 1
  6. snowy

    snowy so kawaii Staff Member

    That is very morbidly fascinating. I dropped one of NK's bombs on Portland. It failed to wipe out all of the hipsters.
     
    • Like Like x 5
  7. MSD

    MSD Very Tilted

    Location:
    CT
    North Korea announcing a nuclear attack has as much credibility as Ethiopia announcing a moon landing.They got a tiny satellite to orbit on the fourth try and managed to detonate one, maybe two nuclear bombs. They're threatening an attack that requires capabilities that do not exist.
     
  8. Baraka_Guru

    Baraka_Guru Möderätor Staff Member

    Location:
    Toronto
    With all due respect, this is downplaying it a bit much. Ethiopia hasn't tried anything resembling intentions to one day land on the moon (not to my knowledge anyway). More realistically, it would be like a nation saying it's going to land on the moon after a) shooting a small, unmanned rocket to the moon, and b) successfully manning a "moon landing" on the sea floor. This means that in theory they have some semblance of the ingredients to do a moon landing: a) rocketeering (or whatever it's called), and b) manning a moon lander (or sea lander, whatever).

    But to think they can put a and b together is quite a stretch.

    This is the case with North Korea. We know they have a) short-, medium-, and long-range missile capability, and b) the capacity to detonate a nuclear device. They are, however, quite unlikely to have the capability of putting this nuclear strike a and b together. Some don't even think they have the right materials for a proper weapon.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
    • Like Like x 1
  9. rogue49

    rogue49 Tech Kung Fu Artist Staff Member

    Location:
    Baltimore/DC
    Actually, that is my concern being relatively near DC.
    So seeing what an improvised device being set off would impact the immediate inner city area...but not farther than that.
    So, unless I'm doing a project within the city...it's about escaping the fallout.

    Nice to know I need to think about these things. :confused:

    But, it's estimated that NK has around 15-25 bombs, if it could get them all off...but their capacity at its highest tested isn't big.
    Seoul would likely be the most impacted by its proximity.
    But the rest of the nation would easily survive.

    It's certainly not a huge threat to either the US or China...but they don't want to chance it anyway, understandably so.

    I still say, if something did happen...it would be a Post-WWII Germany/Berlin scenario.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. If the shit does hit the fan, the phrase 'bombing them back into the Stone Age' doesn't have the same impact here, does it?

    [​IMG]

    I like ralphie250 's idea the best, Lil Kim needs a kick in the balls.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  11. ralphie250

    ralphie250 Fully Erect

    Location:
    At work..
  12. cynthetiq

    cynthetiq Administrator Staff Member Donor

    Location:
    New York City
    I'm in Pentagon City Mall. I'm toast.
     
  13. the_jazz

    the_jazz Accused old lady puncher

    MSD, you're assuming that a nuclear weapon would be delivered via missile. It is not required to be.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. ring

    ring

    kim j.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 2
  15. ^ fuck, we're doomed

    and then there's this

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2013
    • Like Like x 1